[SE-0161] Fix minor typo (#2073)

Author: Jager-yoo

proposals/0161-key-paths.md

@@ -182,9 +182,9 @@ We also explored many different spellings, each with different strengths. We hav
 | Case | `#keyPath` | Function Type Reference | Escape |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | Fully qualified | `#keyPath(Person, .friends[0].name)` | `Person.friends[0].name` | `\Person.friends[0].name` |
-| Type Inferred| `#keyPath(.friends[0].name)` |`Person.friends[0].name`  | `\.friends[0].name` |
+| Type Inferred | `#keyPath(.friends[0].name)` |`Person.friends[0].name`  | `\.friends[0].name` |
 
-While the crispness of the function-type-reference is appealing, it becomes ambigious when working with type properties.  The escape-sigil variant avoids this, and remains quite readable.
+While the crispness of the function-type-reference is appealing, it becomes ambiguous when working with type properties.  The escape-sigil variant avoids this, and remains quite readable.
 
 #### Why `\`?
 During review many different sigils were considered: 
@@ -199,4 +199,3 @@ During review many different sigils were considered:
 
 #### Function Type References
 We think the disambiguating benefits of the escape-sigil would greatly benefit function type references, but such considerations are outside the scope of this proposal.
-