Update for the more restrictive return types in SyntaxRewriter

Author: ahoppen

Sources/SwiftFormatPrettyPrint/TokenStreamCreator.swift

@@ -3583,23 +3583,23 @@ class CommentMovingRewriter: SyntaxRewriter {
   /// Map of tokens to alternate trivia to use as the token's leading trivia.
   var rewriteTokenTriviaMap: [TokenSyntax: Trivia] = [:]
 
-  override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> SourceFileSyntax {
     if shouldFormatterIgnore(file: node) {
-      return Syntax(node)
+      return node
     }
     return super.visit(node)
   }
 
-  override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemSyntax) -> CodeBlockItemSyntax {
     if shouldFormatterIgnore(node: Syntax(node)) {
-      return Syntax(node)
+      return node
     }
     return super.visit(node)
   }
 
-  override func visit(_ node: MemberDeclListItemSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  override func visit(_ node: MemberDeclListItemSyntax) -> MemberDeclListItemSyntax {
     if shouldFormatterIgnore(node: Syntax(node)) {
-      return Syntax(node)
+      return node
     }
     return super.visit(node)
   }

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/DoNotUseSemicolons.swift

@@ -98,12 +98,12 @@ public final class DoNotUseSemicolons: SyntaxFormatRule {
     return nodeCreator(newItems)
   }
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemListSyntax) -> Syntax {
-    return Syntax(nodeByRemovingSemicolons(from: node, nodeCreator: CodeBlockItemListSyntax.init))
+  public override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemListSyntax) -> CodeBlockItemListSyntax {
+    return nodeByRemovingSemicolons(from: node, nodeCreator: CodeBlockItemListSyntax.init)
   }
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: MemberDeclListSyntax) -> Syntax {
-    return Syntax(nodeByRemovingSemicolons(from: node, nodeCreator: MemberDeclListSyntax.init))
+  public override func visit(_ node: MemberDeclListSyntax) -> MemberDeclListSyntax {
+    return nodeByRemovingSemicolons(from: node, nodeCreator: MemberDeclListSyntax.init)
   }
 }
 

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/FileScopedDeclarationPrivacy.swift

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ import SwiftSyntax
 /// Format: File-scoped declarations that have formal access opposite to the desired access level in
 ///         the formatter's configuration will have their access level changed.
 public final class FileScopedDeclarationPrivacy: SyntaxFormatRule {
-  public override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> SourceFileSyntax {
     let newStatements = rewrittenCodeBlockItems(node.statements)
-    return Syntax(node.withStatements(newStatements))
+    return node.withStatements(newStatements)
   }
 
   /// Returns a list of code block items equivalent to the given list, but where any file-scoped

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/NoCasesWithOnlyFallthrough.swift

@@ -21,14 +21,14 @@ import SwiftSyntax
 ///         `default`; in that case, the fallthrough `case` is deleted.
 public final class NoCasesWithOnlyFallthrough: SyntaxFormatRule {
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: SwitchCaseListSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: SwitchCaseListSyntax) -> SwitchCaseListSyntax {
     var newChildren: [Syntax] = []
     var fallthroughOnlyCases: [SwitchCaseSyntax] = []
 
     /// Flushes any un-collapsed violations to the new cases list.
     func flushViolations() {
       fallthroughOnlyCases.forEach {
-        newChildren.append(super.visit($0))
+        newChildren.append(Syntax(super.visit($0)))
       }
       fallthroughOnlyCases.removeAll()
     }
@@ -50,14 +50,14 @@ public final class NoCasesWithOnlyFallthrough: SyntaxFormatRule {
         guard !fallthroughOnlyCases.isEmpty else {
           // If there are no violations recorded, just append the case. There's nothing we can try
           // to merge into it.
-          newChildren.append(visit(switchCase))
+          newChildren.append(Syntax(visit(switchCase)))
           continue
         }
 
         if canMergeWithPreviousCases(switchCase) {
           // If the current case can be merged with the ones before it, merge them all, leaving no
           // `fallthrough`-only cases behind.
-          newChildren.append(visit(mergedCases(fallthroughOnlyCases + [switchCase])))
+          newChildren.append(Syntax(visit(mergedCases(fallthroughOnlyCases + [switchCase]))))
         } else {
           // If the current case can't be merged with the ones before it, merge the previous ones
           // into a single `fallthrough`-only case and then append the current one. This could
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ public final class NoCasesWithOnlyFallthrough: SyntaxFormatRule {
           //     the program's behavior.
           // 3.  The current case is `@unknown default`, which can't be merged notwithstanding the
           //     side-effect issues discussed above.
-          newChildren.append(visit(mergedCases(fallthroughOnlyCases)))
-          newChildren.append(visit(switchCase))
+          newChildren.append(Syntax(visit(mergedCases(fallthroughOnlyCases))))
+          newChildren.append(Syntax(visit(switchCase)))
         }
 
         fallthroughOnlyCases.removeAll()
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ public final class NoCasesWithOnlyFallthrough: SyntaxFormatRule {
     // anything.
     flushViolations()
 
-    return Syntax(SwitchCaseListSyntax(newChildren))
+    return SwitchCaseListSyntax(newChildren)
   }
 
   /// Returns true if this case can definitely be merged with any that come before it.

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/NoLabelsInCasePatterns.swift

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import SwiftSyntax
 ///
 /// Format: Redundant labels in case patterns are removed.
 public final class NoLabelsInCasePatterns: SyntaxFormatRule {
-  public override func visit(_ node: SwitchCaseLabelSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: SwitchCaseLabelSyntax) -> SwitchCaseLabelSyntax {
     var newCaseItems: [CaseItemSyntax] = []
     for item in node.caseItems {
       guard let expPat = item.pattern.as(ExpressionPatternSyntax.self) else {
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ public final class NoLabelsInCasePatterns: SyntaxFormatRule {
       newCaseItems.append(newItem)
     }
     let newCaseItemList = CaseItemListSyntax(newCaseItems)
-    return Syntax(node.withCaseItems(newCaseItemList))
+    return node.withCaseItems(newCaseItemList)
   }
 }
 

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/NoParensAroundConditions.swift

@@ -53,23 +53,23 @@ public final class NoParensAroundConditions: SyntaxFormatRule {
   }
 
   public override func visit(_ node: IfStmtSyntax) -> StmtSyntax {
-    let conditions = visit(node.conditions).as(ConditionElementListSyntax.self)!
+    let conditions = visit(node.conditions)
     var result = node.withIfKeyword(node.ifKeyword.withOneTrailingSpace())
       .withConditions(conditions)
-      .withBody(CodeBlockSyntax(visit(node.body)))
+      .withBody(visit(node.body))
     if let elseBody = node.elseBody {
       result = result.withElseBody(visit(elseBody))
     }
     return StmtSyntax(result)
   }
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: ConditionElementSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: ConditionElementSyntax) -> ConditionElementSyntax {
     guard let tup = node.condition.as(TupleExprSyntax.self),
       tup.elementList.firstAndOnly != nil
     else {
       return super.visit(node)
     }
-    return Syntax(node.withCondition(Syntax(extractExpr(tup))))
+    return node.withCondition(Syntax(extractExpr(tup)))
   }
 
   /// FIXME(hbh): Parsing for SwitchStmtSyntax is not implemented.
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ public final class NoParensAroundConditions: SyntaxFormatRule {
       return super.visit(node)
     }
     return StmtSyntax(
-      node.withExpression(extractExpr(tup)).withCases(SwitchCaseListSyntax(visit(node.cases))))
+      node.withExpression(extractExpr(tup)).withCases(visit(node.cases)))
   }
 
   public override func visit(_ node: RepeatWhileStmtSyntax) -> StmtSyntax {
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ public final class NoParensAroundConditions: SyntaxFormatRule {
     }
     let newNode = node.withCondition(extractExpr(tup))
       .withWhileKeyword(node.whileKeyword.withOneTrailingSpace())
-      .withBody(CodeBlockSyntax(visit(node.body)))
+      .withBody(visit(node.body))
     return StmtSyntax(newNode)
   }
 }

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/NoVoidReturnOnFunctionSignature.swift

@@ -23,16 +23,16 @@ public final class NoVoidReturnOnFunctionSignature: SyntaxFormatRule {
   /// Remove the `-> Void` return type for function signatures. Do not remove
   /// it for closure signatures, because that may introduce an ambiguity when closure signatures
   /// are inferred.
-  public override func visit(_ node: FunctionSignatureSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: FunctionSignatureSyntax) -> FunctionSignatureSyntax {
     if let ret = node.output?.returnType.as(SimpleTypeIdentifierSyntax.self), ret.name.text == "Void" {
       diagnose(.removeRedundantReturn("Void"), on: ret)
-      return Syntax(node.withOutput(nil))
+      return node.withOutput(nil)
     }
     if let tup = node.output?.returnType.as(TupleTypeSyntax.self), tup.elements.isEmpty {
       diagnose(.removeRedundantReturn("()"), on: tup)
-      return Syntax(node.withOutput(nil))
+      return node.withOutput(nil)
     }
-    return Syntax(node)
+    return node
   }
 }
 

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/OneVariableDeclarationPerLine.swift

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import SwiftSyntax
 /// split into multiple declarations, each declaring one of the variables, as
 /// long as the result would still be syntactically valid.
 public final class OneVariableDeclarationPerLine: SyntaxFormatRule {
-  public override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemListSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: CodeBlockItemListSyntax) -> CodeBlockItemListSyntax {
     guard node.contains(where: codeBlockItemHasMultipleVariableBindings) else {
       return super.visit(node)
     }
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ public final class OneVariableDeclarationPerLine: SyntaxFormatRule {
         // It's not a variable declaration with multiple bindings, so visit it
         // recursively (in case it's something that contains bindings that need
         // to be split) but otherwise do nothing.
-        let newItem = super.visit(codeBlockItem).as(CodeBlockItemSyntax.self)!
+        let newItem = super.visit(codeBlockItem)
         newItems.append(newItem)
         continue
       }
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public final class OneVariableDeclarationPerLine: SyntaxFormatRule {
       newItems.append(contentsOf: splitter.nodes(bySplitting: visitedDecl))
     }
 
-    return Syntax(CodeBlockItemListSyntax(newItems))
+    return CodeBlockItemListSyntax(newItems)
   }
 
   /// Returns true if the given `CodeBlockItemSyntax` contains a `let` or `var`

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/OrderedImports.swift

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import SwiftSyntax
 /// Format: Imports will be reordered and grouped at the top of the file.
 public final class OrderedImports: SyntaxFormatRule {
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: SourceFileSyntax) -> SourceFileSyntax {
     let lines = generateLines(codeBlockItemList: node.statements, context: context)
 
     // Stores the formatted and sorted lines that will be used to reconstruct the list of code block
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ public final class OrderedImports: SyntaxFormatRule {
     let newNode = node.withStatements(
       CodeBlockItemListSyntax(convertToCodeBlockItems(lines: formattedLines))
     )
-    return Syntax(newNode)
+    return newNode
   }
 
   /// Raise lint errors if the different import types appear in the wrong order, and if import

Sources/SwiftFormatRules/ReturnVoidInsteadOfEmptyTuple.swift

@@ -41,12 +41,12 @@ public final class ReturnVoidInsteadOfEmptyTuple: SyntaxFormatRule {
 
     // Make sure that function types nested in the argument list are also rewritten (for example,
     // `(Int -> ()) -> ()` should become `(Int -> Void) -> Void`).
-    let arguments = visit(node.arguments).as(TupleTypeElementListSyntax.self)!
+    let arguments = visit(node.arguments)
     let voidKeyword = makeVoidIdentifierType(toReplace: returnType)
     return TypeSyntax(node.withArguments(arguments).withReturnType(TypeSyntax(voidKeyword)))
   }
 
-  public override func visit(_ node: ClosureSignatureSyntax) -> Syntax {
+  public override func visit(_ node: ClosureSignatureSyntax) -> ClosureSignatureSyntax {
     guard let output = node.output,
       let returnType = output.returnType.as(TupleTypeSyntax.self),
       returnType.elements.count == 0
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ public final class ReturnVoidInsteadOfEmptyTuple: SyntaxFormatRule {
       // If the closure input is a complete parameter clause (variables and types), make sure that
       // nested function types are also rewritten (for example, `label: (Int -> ()) -> ()` should
       // become `label: (Int -> Void) -> Void`).
-      input = visit(parameterClause)
+      input = Syntax(visit(parameterClause))
     } else {
       // Otherwise, it's a simple signature (just variable names, no types), so there is nothing to
       // rewrite.
       input = node.input
     }
     let voidKeyword = makeVoidIdentifierType(toReplace: returnType)
-    return Syntax(node.withInput(input).withOutput(output.withReturnType(TypeSyntax(voidKeyword))))
+    return node.withInput(input).withOutput(output.withReturnType(TypeSyntax(voidKeyword)))
   }
 
   /// Returns a value indicating whether the leading trivia of the given token contained any