You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
| ny_bulk_transmission_cost_recovery.md | NY bulk transmission big picture: NYISO TOs, OATT/TSC mechanics, FERC vs PSC jurisdiction, per-utility evidence TX is in delivery RR, magnitudes, CLCPA new TX, comparison with ISO-NE |
38
-
| ri_bulk_transmission_cost_recovery.md | RI/ISO-NE bulk transmission big picture: PTOs, PTF vs non-PTF, RNS vs LNS, how RNS passes through to RIE retail bill, why NE unbundles TX, magnitudes, Eversource HP TX discount, embedded vs marginal cost |
| ny_bulk_transmission_cost_recovery.md | NY bulk transmission big picture: NYISO TOs, OATT/TSC mechanics, FERC vs PSC jurisdiction, per-utility evidence TX is in delivery RR, magnitudes, CLCPA new TX, comparison with ISO-NE |
38
+
| ri_bulk_transmission_cost_recovery.md | RI/ISO-NE bulk transmission big picture: PTOs, PTF vs non-PTF, RNS vs LNS, how RNS passes through to RIE retail bill, why NE unbundles TX, magnitudes, Eversource HP TX discount, embedded vs marginal cost |
39
+
| marginal_distribution_om_costs.md | Distribution O&M cost causation: why incremental load does not meaningfully create marginal distribution O&M costs. Activity-by-activity analysis (vegetation, inspection, storm, equipment), the one theoretical mechanism (transformer thermal degradation) and why it's negligible for below-rating winter loads, RAP/NARUC classification critique, PG&E pipeline analogy. Answers Lance Schaefer's (Concentric) objection. |
0 commit comments