Timesheets test ids adjustments

[piotr-iohk]

Description

Adjustments for Timesheets test ids to make it consistent for iOS/Android.

Related:
synonymdev/bitkit-e2e-tests#44
synonymdev/bitkit-ios#213

Preview

QA Notes

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR standardizes test tag naming conventions by migrating from snake_case to PascalCase format. The changes improve consistency and readability of test identifiers across UI components.

Key Changes:

• Renamed test tags in HighBalanceWarningSheet and BackupIntroScreen to use PascalCase with hierarchical prefixes
• Updated corresponding test assertions in BackupIntroScreenTest to match new tag names

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt	Updated 7 test tags from snake_case to PascalCase (e.g., high_balance_intro_screen → HighBalanceSheet)
BackupIntroScreen.kt	Updated 7 test tags from snake_case to PascalCase (e.g., backup_intro_screen → BackupIntroView)
BackupIntroScreenTest.kt	Updated test assertions to use new PascalCase test tags

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

app/src/androidTest/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:64

• The test tag reference 'backup_intro_screen' should be updated to 'BackupIntroView' to match the renamed tag in BackupIntroScreen.kt line 47.

        composeTestRule.onNodeWithTag("backup_intro_screen").assertExists()

app/src/androidTest/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:67

• The test tag reference 'later_button' should be updated to 'BackupIntroViewCancel' to match the renamed tag in BackupIntroScreen.kt line 94.

        composeTestRule.onNodeWithTag("later_button").assertExists().performClick()

app/src/androidTest/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:70

• The test tag reference 'backup_button' should be updated to 'BackupIntroViewContinue' to match the renamed tag in BackupIntroScreen.kt line 103.

        composeTestRule.onNodeWithTag("backup_button").assertExists().performClick()

[claude]

PR Review: Timesheets Test IDs Adjustments

Summary

This PR updates test IDs in the Backup and High Balance Warning screens to follow a consistent PascalCase naming convention, improving alignment between iOS and Android test automation.

Code Quality and Best Practices ✅

Positives:

• Consistent naming convention: The changes adopt a clear PascalCase pattern (BackupIntroView, HighBalanceSheet) that matches the existing convention used elsewhere in the codebase (e.g., WidgetEdit, QuickpayToggle).
• Improved readability: The new test IDs are more descriptive and follow a hierarchical structure (e.g., BackupIntroViewCancel, BackupIntroViewContinue).
• Comprehensive updates: Both production code and test files are updated in sync, maintaining consistency.
• No functional changes: This is purely a refactoring of test identifiers with no impact on app functionality.

Potential Issues 🔍

1. Test ID Naming Inconsistency
There's a slight inconsistency in the button naming:

• BackupIntroViewCancel vs HighBalanceSheetCancel
• BackupIntroViewContinue vs HighBalanceSheetContinue

The "Cancel" button in HighBalanceSheet actually triggers "Learn More" functionality (see HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt:89), but the test ID is named Cancel. This could be confusing for test automation.

Suggestion: Consider using HighBalanceSheetLearnMore instead of HighBalanceSheetCancel to better reflect the actual button functionality.

2. Missing Test ID in BackupIntroScreenTest
In the first test at BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:35, the backup_title test ID check is not updated to use the new naming convention (BackupIntroViewTitle), though this might be intentional if that test only validates essential elements.

Performance Considerations ✅

No performance impact. Test IDs are compile-time constants used for UI testing.

Security Concerns ✅

No security implications. These are test identifiers only.

Test Coverage 📋

Current Coverage:

• ✅ Tests verify screen components exist
• ✅ Tests verify button clicks work correctly
• ✅ Both test files are updated to match production code changes

Observations:

1. The tests in BackupIntroScreenTest.kt properly validate the component hierarchy and interactions.
2. No new tests are needed since this is a refactoring of identifiers only.
3. The changes align with the e2e test ID mapping documented in docs/e2e-test-ids.md.

Recommendation: After merging, ensure that any external test automation (Timesheets, e2e tests) that references the old test IDs is also updated to use the new PascalCase identifiers.

Additional Notes

Alignment with Repository Standards:

• ✅ Follows Kotlin coding standards with proper indentation (4 spaces per .editorconfig)
• ✅ PascalCase naming aligns with existing patterns in the codebase
• ✅ Changes are minimal and focused

Cross-Platform Consistency:
The PR description mentions making test IDs "consistent for iOS/Android." Based on the docs/e2e-test-ids.md file, this appears to be preparing for better cross-platform e2e test automation. The PascalCase convention is a good choice as it's platform-neutral and matches React Native's testID conventions.

Verdict: ✅ Approved with Minor Suggestions

This is a well-executed refactoring that improves test ID consistency. The only suggestion is to consider renaming HighBalanceSheetCancel to HighBalanceSheetLearnMore for better semantic clarity.

Files reviewed:

• app/src/androidTest/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreenTest.kt (26 changes)
• app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreen.kt (26 changes)
• app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt (26 changes)

[claude]

Code Review - PR #462: Timesheets test ids adjustments

Overview

This PR updates test IDs in the backup intro screen and high balance warning sheet to maintain consistency between iOS and Android implementations. The changes are straightforward and improve cross-platform test maintainability.

✅ Positive Findings

1. Code Quality & Best Practices

• Clean, focused changes with clear purpose
• Consistent naming convention applied across all modified test IDs
• Follows PascalCase pattern (e.g., BackupIntroView, HighBalanceSheet) which is more descriptive than the previous snake_case
• All test tags properly updated in both implementation and test files
• Proper use of Jetpack Compose testTag modifier

2. Test Coverage

• All existing test assertions updated correctly in BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:30-98
• Test coverage maintained - no tests were removed or degraded
• The test file demonstrates good testing practices with proper assertions for all UI elements

3. Consistency

• Naming pattern is now hierarchical and self-documenting:
  • Root: BackupIntroView / HighBalanceSheet
  • Children: {Root}Image, {Root}Title, {Root}Description, etc.
• This makes test IDs easier to understand and maintain

💡 Observations & Recommendations

1. Missing Test Coverage

• HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt has test IDs but no corresponding test file
• Recommendation: Consider adding HighBalanceWarningSheetTest.kt to ensure this component is properly tested, similar to how BackupIntroScreen is tested

2. Semantic Button Naming
The button naming follows a Cancel/Continue pattern:

• BackupIntroViewCancel / BackupIntroViewContinue
• HighBalanceSheetCancel / HighBalanceSheetContinue

However, note that in HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt:89, the "Cancel" button actually triggers learnMoreClick (not a true cancel action). While the test ID naming is fine, this could be confusing. Consider if BackupIntroViewLearnMore might be more semantically accurate, or keep as-is for consistency.

3. Documentation Reference
The PR description mentions "Timesheets test ids" but the actual files modified are related to backup/balance warning sheets. This appears to be a typo in the title/description (should be "Sheets test ids" rather than "Timesheets").

🔒 Security Concerns

✅ No security issues identified. The changes are purely cosmetic test identifier updates.

⚡ Performance Considerations

✅ No performance impact. Test tag modifications have zero runtime overhead.

🐛 Potential Issues

✅ No bugs detected. All changes are consistent and properly applied.

Summary

This is a high-quality, low-risk PR that improves test maintainability and cross-platform consistency. The changes are well-executed and properly tested.

Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE - Ready to merge after addressing the documentation typo.

Optional Follow-up: Consider adding test coverage for HighBalanceWarningSheet in a future PR.

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR standardizes test IDs for timesheets across iOS and Android platforms, improving consistency in the E2E testing infrastructure. The changes follow a PascalCase naming convention that aligns with the documented test ID standards.

---

✅ Positive Observations

1. Consistency Improvements

• The PR successfully standardizes test IDs from snake_case to PascalCase, making them consistent across platforms
• The naming convention is more descriptive and follows a clear pattern (e.g., BackupIntroView, BackupIntroViewImage, BackupIntroViewTitle)
• All related test files are updated in sync with the UI components

2. Documentation Updates

• The e2e-test-ids.md file is properly updated to reflect the changes
• The typo fix (RecomendedFeeButton → RecommendedFeeButton) is a nice catch

3. Test Coverage

• All existing test assertions are maintained
• Tests are comprehensive, covering both individual component presence and user interactions

---

📝 Code Quality & Best Practices

Naming Convention
The new naming follows a hierarchical pattern:

• Root component: BackupIntroView, HighBalanceSheet
• Child elements: [ParentName][ElementType] (e.g., BackupIntroViewImage, HighBalanceSheetTitle)
• Action buttons: [ParentName][Action] (e.g., BackupIntroViewCancel, BackupIntroViewContinue)

This is a solid pattern that scales well and makes the component hierarchy clear.

Consistency Notes

• Button naming uses semantic labels (Cancel, Continue) rather than generic terms (later_button, backup_button)
• The pattern is consistently applied across all modified files

---

🔍 Potential Issues

Minor Observation: Semantic Naming Inconsistency
In HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt:89,97, the buttons are named:

• HighBalanceSheetCancel for the "Learn more" button
• HighBalanceSheetContinue for the "I understand" button

The semantic meaning of "Cancel" for "Learn more" is slightly misleading. However, this maintains consistency with the BackupIntroScreen pattern and likely matches iOS conventions, so it's acceptable if this is intentional.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

Impact: None

• Test ID changes have zero runtime performance impact
• The changes only affect test automation infrastructure
• No functional code logic is modified

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Impact: None

• No security implications from renaming test IDs
• All changes are limited to UI testing infrastructure

---

✅ Test Coverage

Excellent Test Coverage

• All renamed test IDs have corresponding test assertions
• The test file BackupIntroScreenTest.kt properly validates all UI components
• Both interaction tests (performClick()) and presence tests (assertExists()) are included
• The changes demonstrate good test-driven development practices

---

📊 Change Analysis

Files Changed: 5

• 2 production files (UI screens)
• 1 test file
• 1 documentation file
• 1 sheet component

Line Changes: 58 (29 additions, 29 deletions - perfectly balanced refactoring)

Risk Level: Very Low

• Pure refactoring with no functional changes
• Well-scoped changes with clear intent
• All changes are mechanical renames

---

🎯 Recommendations

1. ✅ Approve: This PR is well-executed and ready to merge
2. Optional: Consider adding a comment explaining the naming convention choice for "Cancel" in the HighBalanceSheetCancel test ID, particularly since the button text is "Learn more"
3. Documentation: The test ID documentation is properly updated - no additional action needed

---

Conclusion

This is a clean, well-organized refactoring PR that improves code consistency and maintainability. The changes are straightforward, well-tested, and properly documented. The standardization will make it easier for developers to locate and understand test IDs across the codebase.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve and Merge

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review - PR #462: Timesheets test ids adjustments

Summary

This PR updates test IDs across multiple components to improve consistency between iOS and Android implementations for E2E testing. The changes rename test tags from snake_case descriptive names to PascalCase hierarchical names.

---

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

• Consistency: The new naming convention (BackupIntroView, BackupIntroViewImage, etc.) follows a clear hierarchical pattern that makes the parent-child relationship between components explicit
• Cross-platform alignment: Aligns Android test IDs with iOS and E2E test suites, reducing maintenance burden
• Complete coverage: All related test files are updated in sync with the implementation changes
• Documentation: The docs/e2e-test-ids.md file is properly updated to reflect the changes

Observations:

1. Naming Convention Change: The shift from descriptive snake_case (backup_intro_screen, backup_image) to PascalCase with prefixes (BackupIntroView, BackupIntroViewImage) is consistent with the broader pattern seen in the codebase (e.g., HomeScrollView, WidgetEditScrollView, SendSheet)

2. Typo Fix: The correction of RecomendedFeeButton → RecommendedFeeButton in BoostTransactionSheet.kt:440 fixes a spelling error that was already suppressed with @Suppress("SpellCheckingInspection") - good catch!

---

🔍 Potential Issues

Minor Concerns:

1. Semantic Mismatch in Button Names (HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt:87-92, BackupIntroScreen.kt:88-94):

   • The button labeled "Learn More" is tagged as HighBalanceSheetCancel
   • The button labeled "Later" is tagged as BackupIntroViewCancel

   While these are technically "cancel" actions in the flow, the naming could be misleading. Consider:

   • HighBalanceSheetLearnMore / BackupIntroViewLater for semantic clarity, OR
   • Document that Cancel represents the "dismiss/defer" action if this is the established convention

   Impact: Low - functionally correct, but could cause confusion for future maintainers

2. Test Tag Consistency:

   • Most components use either *View or *Sheet suffixes consistently
   • The changes maintain this pattern well (e.g., BackupIntroView*, HighBalanceSheet*)

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

No concerns - This PR only changes string constants used for test identification. No runtime performance impact.

---

🔒 Security Concerns

No concerns - Test IDs are for automation purposes only and don't affect security.

---

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent:

• All affected test files are updated: BackupIntroScreenTest.kt properly reflects the new test IDs
• The changes maintain 1:1 mapping between test assertions and component tags
• Tests continue to verify the same UI elements, just with updated identifiers

Verification:

• Test file at app/src/androidTest/java/to/bitkit/ui/settings/backups/BackupIntroScreenTest.kt:33-97 correctly updated
• All 13 test tag references updated consistently

---

📋 Recommendations

1. ✅ Approve with minor suggestion: Consider whether *Cancel is the right semantic name for "Learn More" and "Later" buttons, or if more descriptive names would be clearer

2. Documentation: The E2E test ID documentation (docs/e2e-test-ids.md:80) is properly updated - excellent practice

3. Related PRs: Verify that the related PRs are merged/ready:

   • Test/boost bitkit-e2e-tests#44
   • Test/boost bitkit-ios#213

4. Future consideration: Document the test ID naming convention in a style guide to maintain consistency (e.g., "Use ComponentName + ComponentNameElement pattern, with Cancel/Continue for primary actions")

---

📊 Change Summary

File	Lines Changed	Type
BackupIntroScreenTest.kt	26	Test updates
BackupIntroScreen.kt	14	Implementation
BoostTransactionSheet.kt	2	Typo fix
HighBalanceWarningSheet.kt	14	Implementation
e2e-test-ids.md	2	Documentation
Total	58	29 additions, 29 deletions

---

✅ Final Verdict

LGTM with minor suggestion - This is a well-executed refactoring that improves cross-platform consistency. The code changes are clean, tests are properly updated, and documentation is maintained.

The only suggestion is to consider whether the semantic naming of the "Cancel" buttons could be more descriptive, but this doesn't block approval if it's an established pattern in the codebase.

Great work maintaining consistency across the platform implementations! 🎯