Parity between UART and BLE interfaces

[avg-I]

I looked through documents and example yaml-s but I still cannot figure it out on my own.
Do UART and BLE interfaces (for JK BMS) provide exactly the same information and controls?
Or is one richer than the other?
Or does each one has something that the other doesn't?
And what is the reason for esp32-ble-uart-hybrid configuration?

The context is that I am trying to settle on which interface to use, wired or wireless, so to say.
There are obvious differences in the physical world.
But I also want to understand if I would be missing anything if I pick up just one protocol.

Thank you.

[syssi]

The UART-TTL (GPS protocol) doesn't provide the balancing current, balancing cannot be turned on/off and no settings can be changed.

BLE supports balancing current, a balancer switch and the settings of the device can be changed.

The hybrid examples fixes the gap. On new devices there is another protocol option (Modbus) available via UART-TTL. Modbus should provide the same data points / controls as the BLE protocol (if implemented properly. It's work in progress).

[avg-I]

Thanks a lot!