Replies: 2 comments
-
Issue 1 is fixed by #1439 which is already merged. Gonna tag a release tomorrow. Issue 2: Yep edit: We never had suggestions for arbitrary values for utilities 😄 — will have to design that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I transferred this to IntelliSense as the arbitrary value thing is gonna require design in core and here and this feels like the most appropriate place for it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What version of Tailwind CSS are you using?
v4.1.12, and actually even the most recent insiders version (
0.0.0-insiders.8165e04
) since I know you fixed some related issues in tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#18798 and tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#18799.What build tool (or framework if it abstracts the build tool) are you using?
None, just
tailwindcss
and@tailwindcss/cli
version0.0.0-insiders.8165e04
What version of Node.js are you using?
v24.5.0
What browser are you using?
N/A
What operating system are you using?
macOS
Reproduction
URLsteps / Describe your issueIssue 1
In a legacy
@plugin
:In the HTML:
foo:
should also be suggested because of theDEFAULT: ""
value, but it's not.Issue 2
In a legacy
@plugin
:In the HTML:
bar-[]
should probably be suggested, for the same reasonfoo-[]:
is suggested above (though I understand the latter is a variant and it may intentionally work differently for utilities).Thank you 🙏 🫶
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions