Fix misleading typo

jugglinmike · ljharb · commit 4c6a137fd0d0 · 2023-02-26T20:47:53.000-05:00
diff --git a/meetings/2023-01/jan-31.md b/meetings/2023-01/jan-31.md
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ BT: I just want to interject. I think we should table this discussion for now. S
 
 YSV: Yeah, I will be quick. I don’t think that a downgrade to stage 2 reopens all past discussion to being relitigated. And I would actually have a problem with downgrading with the intent to move this to being out of band because I feel like that’s been settled. The issue that brought us to this point today is specifically around the keyword and I believe we should scope our discussion to that.
 
-JHD: That doesn’t match my understanding. Moving to stage 2 for this proposal and to stage 3 was predicated on the on the assumption we would be able to have some kind of restriction. If it’s guiding the request, then I don’t believe that that is actually settled. So procedurally speaking I think it would be responsible of us to leave this proposal at stage 3. So I don’t intend to block any movement to stage 2 and I hope nobody else does. But once we have agreed on that I would like to discuss whether it should be even at stage 2. But I think that regardless, it shouldn’t be at stage 3.
+JHD: That doesn’t match my understanding. Moving to stage 2 for this proposal and to stage 3 was predicated on the on the assumption we would be able to have some kind of restriction. If it’s guiding the request, then I don’t believe that that is actually settled. So procedurally speaking I think it would be irresponsible of us to leave this proposal at stage 3. So I don’t intend to block any movement to stage 2 and I hope nobody else does. But once we have agreed on that I would like to discuss whether it should be even at stage 2. But I think that regardless, it shouldn’t be at stage 3.
 
 YSV: The discussion to move down a stage rests with the champions. And I do disagree with the idea that we would complete completely deviate from the discussion that they’ve brought up here in order to continue to downgrade it down to further stages. I think that would be inappropriate.
 
