| description | applyTo |
|---|---|
Guidelines for GitHub Copilot to write comments to achieve self-explanatory code with less comments. Examples are in JavaScript but it should work on any language that has comments. |
** |
Write code that speaks for itself. Comment only when necessary to explain WHY, not WHAT. We do not need comments most of the time.
Obvious Comments
// Bad: States the obvious
let counter = 0; // Initialize counter to zero
counter++; // Increment counter by oneRedundant Comments
// Bad: Comment repeats the code
function getUserName() {
return user.name; // Return the user's name
}Outdated Comments
// Bad: Comment doesn't match the code
// Calculate tax at 5% rate
const tax = price * 0.08; // Actually 8%Complex Business Logic
// Good: Explains WHY this specific calculation
// Apply progressive tax brackets: 10% up to 10k, 20% above
const tax = calculateProgressiveTax(income, [0.10, 0.20], [10000]);Non-obvious Algorithms
// Good: Explains the algorithm choice
// Using Floyd-Warshall for all-pairs shortest paths
// because we need distances between all nodes
for (let k = 0; k < vertices; k++) {
for (let i = 0; i < vertices; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < vertices; j++) {
// ... implementation
}
}
}Regex Patterns
// Good: Explains what the regex matches
// Match email format: username@domain.extension
const emailPattern = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/;API Constraints or Gotchas
// Good: Explains external constraint
// GitHub API rate limit: 5000 requests/hour for authenticated users
await rateLimiter.wait();
const response = await fetch(githubApiUrl);Before writing a comment, ask:
- Is the code self-explanatory? → No comment needed
- Would a better variable/function name eliminate the need? → Refactor instead
- Does this explain WHY, not WHAT? → Good comment
- Will this help future maintainers? → Good comment
/**
* Calculate compound interest using the standard formula.
*
* @param {number} principal - Initial amount invested
* @param {number} rate - Annual interest rate (as decimal, e.g., 0.05 for 5%)
* @param {number} time - Time period in years
* @param {number} compoundFrequency - How many times per year interest compounds (default: 1)
* @returns {number} Final amount after compound interest
*/
function calculateCompoundInterest(principal, rate, time, compoundFrequency = 1) {
// ... implementation
}// Good: Explains the source or reasoning
const MAX_RETRIES = 3; // Based on network reliability studies
const API_TIMEOUT = 5000; // AWS Lambda timeout is 15s, leaving buffer// TODO: Replace with proper user authentication after security review
// FIXME: Memory leak in production - investigate connection pooling
// HACK: Workaround for bug in library v2.1.0 - remove after upgrade
// NOTE: This implementation assumes UTC timezone for all calculations
// WARNING: This function modifies the original array instead of creating a copy
// PERF: Consider caching this result if called frequently in hot path
// SECURITY: Validate input to prevent SQL injection before using in query
// BUG: Edge case failure when array is empty - needs investigation
// REFACTOR: Extract this logic into separate utility function for reusability
// DEPRECATED: Use newApiFunction() instead - this will be removed in v3.0// Bad: Don't comment out code
// const oldFunction = () => { ... };
const newFunction = () => { ... };// Bad: Don't maintain history in comments
// Modified by John on 2023-01-15
// Fixed bug reported by Sarah on 2023-02-03
function processData() {
// ... implementation
}// Bad: Don't use decorative comments
//=====================================
// UTILITY FUNCTIONS
//=====================================Before committing, ensure your comments:
- Explain WHY, not WHAT
- Are grammatically correct and clear
- Will remain accurate as code evolves
- Add genuine value to code understanding
- Are placed appropriately (above the code they describe)
- Use proper spelling and professional language
Remember: The best comment is the one you don't need to write because the code is self-documenting.