Merge pull request #361 from team-dev-docs/2025-06-03-04-45-docs-dmarc-email-setup

Add blog post: My journey implementing DMARC policy for our startup Dev-Docs update

Author: dev-docs-github-app[bot]

dev-docs/context-blog-Email-Domain-Security-DMARC-Policy-for-Startups.md.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+
+
+  ---
+# High Level Context
+## context
+This Markdown file is a blog post aimed at startup founders and teams, discussing the importance of implementing DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) policy for email domain security. The post shares a personal experience of discovering a missing DMARC policy and outlines the steps taken to implement it.
+
+Key points covered in the post include:
+1. The importance of DMARC for custom domains using Google Workspace
+2. A step-by-step process for implementing DMARC
+3. The benefits of having a DMARC policy in place
+4. Advice for other startups to prioritize email security from the beginning
+
+The post serves as both a cautionary tale and a guide for other startup founders to check and implement DMARC policies for their email domains, emphasizing the long-term benefits of this security measure.
+
+---
+# DMARC Record blog/Email-Domain-Security-DMARC-Policy-for-Startups.md
+## Imported Code Object
+Certainly! Here's a concise explanation of the DMARC record in the given code snippet:
+
+This is a DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) record. It specifies how email receivers should handle messages that fail authentication checks. The record contains three parts:
+
+1. `v=DMARC1`: Version of DMARC being used (currently version 1).
+
+2. `p=none`: Policy for handling failed messages. "none" means no action is taken, but reports are still generated.
+
+3. `rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@{{our domain}}`: Specifies the email address where aggregate reports should be sent.
+
+This DMARC record is set up for monitoring purposes, collecting data on email authentication without enforcing any actions on failed messages.
+
+