-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Description
Hello!
I'm a programmer with Dr. Chad Sylvester's lab at WashU, and we were attempting to use the dhcpAsym-cohort-42 templates to resample native surfaces for neonates generated by Nibabies using their "MCRIBS" reconstruction method into dHCP-den-32k space, since MCRIBS generates native spheres registered to the week 42 dHCP standard spheres.
We've tried performing this resampling post-Nibabies by running the wb_comand -surface-resample command, inputting the subject's outputted native sphere, the subject's native sphere in register with dHCP space, and the standard dHCP 42-week sphere with a density of 32k vertices, for each hemisphere. We're also using the BARYCENTRIC option when running this command.
We've been having some mixed results when using these inputs -- the problem may either be on the MCRIBS surface-reconstruction side, where the native spheres supposedly in register with dHCP space aren't as well-registered as they could be, or the standard-space 42-week cohort spheres we're pulling from TemplateFlow aren't the ones we should be using.
In the process of troubleshooting, I wanted to see what the 32k-density label files looked like overlaid onto the template midthickness surface GIFTIs in Workbench -- it appears even the label file seems to have some registration issues, noticeably around the medial wall area, where areas marked as frontal/parietal lobe and cingulate gyrus encroach pretty deeply into the medial wall. Here's a screenshot:
(I also had to rename the label files to load them in, replacing the underscore before label.gii with another period).
Am I overlaying the correct label file here?