Align on the approach for [[maybe unused]] parameters in LLK LIB

[ndivnicTT]

Example PR-s:
tenstorrent/tt-metal#38352
tenstorrent/tt-metal#38522

Velja's suggestion:
Make unused parameters asserting value 0. This appoach would keep LLK LIB function signatures the same but would require asserts.

Other approach - delete unused parameters - no asserts but different LLK LIB function signatures - would require LLK API to handle the differences.