-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
fully configurable elasticsearch solution #428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
1b94932 to
4550455
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
4550455 to
c91a000
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
|
/run pipeline |
1afeca2 to
3cde97d
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
5018bdc to
e4798d0
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
a9b6986 to
4a7d4f2
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
|
/run pipeline |
07c0ac4 to
d694ebb
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
d694ebb to
3947525
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
2 similar comments
|
/run pipeline |
|
/run pipeline |
b1431d5 to
78d311d
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
|
/run pipeline |
094e3fc to
ffa72c9
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| variable "skip_es_kms_auth_policy" { | ||
| variable "skip_elasticsearch_kms_auth_policy" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check skip_redis_kms_auth_policy in redis, which description is correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the elasticsearch description is more accurate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, we need to change in redis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes made in fully-configurable, should be added to security-enforced as well
1d86fe0 to
caa7b10
Compare
caa7b10 to
1e6e255
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
|
/run pipeline |
|
/run pipeline |
|
/run pipeline |
1 similar comment
|
/run pipeline |
1779b7d to
5df79da
Compare
|
/run pipeline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check input "users" in security DA as well and sync with redis
auto_scaling needs #autoscaling in a link (security)
| } | ||
|
|
||
| variable "skip_es_kms_auth_policy" { | ||
| variable "skip_elasticsearch_kms_auth_policy" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, we need to change in redis
|
/run pipeline |
|
/run pipeline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
BREAKING CHANGE: There is no supported upgrade path from `standard` to the new `Fully configurable` or `Security-enforced` DA variations
For issue - https://github.ibm.com/GoldenEye/issues/issues/12892
Description
Release required?
x.x.X)x.X.x)X.x.x)Release notes content
Run the pipeline
If the CI pipeline doesn't run when you create the PR, the PR requires a user with GitHub collaborators access to run the pipeline.
Run the CI pipeline when the PR is ready for review and you expect tests to pass. Add a comment to the PR with the following text:
Checklist for reviewers
For mergers