Move from com.jcraft:jsch to com.github.mwiede:jsch #10275
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Upgrade testImplementation dependency from `com.jcraft:jsch:0.1.55` to `com.github.mwiede:jsch:2.27.0` The artifact was moved, see * https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.jcraft/jsch * https://github.com/mwiede/jsch
julianladisch
force-pushed
the
jsch-mwiede
branch
from
63c3e3f to
7ea6d3e
Compare
eddumelendez
changed the title
Member
|
Thanks for your contribution, @julianladisch |
eddumelendez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
Upgrade testImplementation dependency from `com.jcraft:jsch:0.1.55` to `com.github.mwiede:jsch:2.27.0`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Upgrade testImplementation dependency from
com.jcraft:jsch:0.1.55to
com.github.mwiede:jsch:2.27.0The artifact was moved, see
Sorry, I've waited two months (since 2025-03-17 #10096) but the existing process failed to do the upgrade.