@@ -157,7 +157,16 @@ function calcMeanSTA(post; pre)
157157 N = 0
158158 @showprogress for n in post
159159 ii = s. input_info[n]
160- inputs = (pre == :exc ) ? ii. exc_inputs : ii. inh_inputs
160+ if pre == :exc
161+ inputs = ii. exc_inputs
162+ elseif pre == :inh
163+ inputs = ii. inh_inputs
164+ elseif pre == :FP
165+ perf = cached_conntest_eval (s,n,p)
166+ tn = perf. tested_neurons
167+ is_FP = (tn. real_type .== :unconn ) .& (tn. predicted_type .!= :unconn )
168+ inputs = tn. input_neuron_ID[is_FP]
169+ end
161170 for m in inputs
162171 STA = calcSTA (m, n, s, p)
163172 if isnothing (avgSTA) avgSTA = STA
@@ -173,6 +182,9 @@ avgSTA_EI = calcMeanSTA(inh_post, pre=:exc)
173182avgSTA_IE = calcMeanSTA (exc_post, pre= :inh )
174183avgSTA_II = calcMeanSTA (inh_post, pre= :inh );
175184
185+ avgSTA_FP_E = calcMeanSTA (exc_post, pre= :FP )
186+ avgSTA_FP_I = calcMeanSTA (inh_post, pre= :FP );
187+
176188function Plot. plotsig (x, p:: ExpParams ; tscale = ms, kw... )
177189 duration = length (x) * p. sim. general. Δt
178190 t = linspace (zero (duration), duration, length (x)) / tscale
185197plotsig (avgSTA_EE / mV, p, hylabel= " Average E→E STA (mV)" , ylim= [- 49.4 , - 48 ]); plt. subplots ();
186198plotsig (avgSTA_EI / mV, p, hylabel= " Average E→I STA (mV)" , ylim= [- 49.4 , - 48 ]); plt. subplots ();
187199plotsig (avgSTA_IE / mV, p, hylabel= " Average I→E STA (mV)" , ylim= [- 51 , - 48.5 ]); plt. subplots ();
188- plotsig (avgSTA_II / mV, p, hylabel= " Average I→I STA (mV)" , ylim= [- 51 , - 48.5 ]);
200+ plotsig (avgSTA_II / mV, p, hylabel= " Average I→I STA (mV)" , ylim= [- 51 , - 48.5 ]); plt. subplots ();
201+ plotsig (avgSTA_FP_E / mV, p, hylabel= " Average FP→E STA (mV)" ); plt. subplots ();
202+ plotsig (avgSTA_FP_I / mV, p, hylabel= " Average FP→I STA (mV)" );
189203
190204# Inhibitory neurons seem to have a lower average voltage, from looking at their STA baselines.
191205
@@ -199,6 +213,8 @@ avg_voltage(inh_post) / mV
199213
200214# Yup, that tracks.
201215
216+ # For the average false positive STAs, we indeed see the 2 x (propagation + integration delay) (± 40 ms) dip seen before.
217+
202218# ## Disynaptic false positive (FP) hypothesis
203219
204220# We suspect false positive detections are due to an intermediary connected neuron.
0 commit comments