Skip to content

Commit cf45618

Browse files
committed
Remove links to outdated pep 458
The first removed link is supposed to provide additional reasons for the need of consistent snapshots. Besides pointing to a removed anchor in an outdated and unmaintained version of pep 485, the spec already lists the same reasons that are mentioned in the pep. The second link points to a different (existing) section in the same outdated document, but gives implementation details that IMO don't need to be in the spec. If wished we can update the second link instead of removing it.
1 parent 0a29011 commit cf45618

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-5
lines changed

tuf-spec.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1304,9 +1304,7 @@ non-volatile storage as FILENAME.EXT.
13041304
high-level idea of the solution is that each snapshot will be contained in a
13051305
so-called consistent snapshot. If a client is reading from one consistent
13061306
snapshot, then the repository is free to write another consistent snapshot
1307-
without interrupting that client. For more reasons on why we need consistent
1308-
snapshots, please see
1309-
https://github.com/theupdateframework/pep-on-pypi-with-tuf#why-do-we-need-consistent-snapshots
1307+
without interrupting that client.
13101308

13111309
* **7.1. Writing consistent snapshots**
13121310

@@ -1358,8 +1356,6 @@ non-volatile storage as FILENAME.EXT.
13581356
released versions of root metadata files should always be provided
13591357
so that outdated clients can update to the latest available root.
13601358

1361-
For more details on how this would apply on a community repository, please
1362-
see https://github.com/theupdateframework/pep-on-pypi-with-tuf#producing-consistent-snapshots
13631359

13641360
* **7.2. Reading consistent snapshots**
13651361

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)