This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2025. It is now read-only.
forked from openai/simple-evals
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathhealthbench_eval.py
More file actions
632 lines (551 loc) · 25.1 KB
/
healthbench_eval.py
File metadata and controls
632 lines (551 loc) · 25.1 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
"""
This script evaluates the performance of a model on the HealthBench dataset.
To run HealthBench, HealthBench Consensus, or HealthBench Hard, use the simple-evals script:
- `python -m simple-evals.simple_evals --eval=healthbench --model=gpt-4.1`
- `python -m simple-evals.simple_evals --eval=healthbench_consensus --model=gpt-4.1`
- `python -m simple-evals.simple_evals --eval=healthbench_hard --model=gpt-4.1`
You can also evaluate physician ideal completions or reference completions against the HealthBench rubrics. To do so, run the following command:
- To evaluate physician ideal completions: `python -m simple-evals.healthbench_eval --run_mode=physician_completions`
- To evaluate reference model completions used by physicians: `python -m simple-evals.healthbench_eval --run_mode=physician_completion_references`
"""
import argparse
import copy
import hashlib
import json
import random
import re
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Literal
import blobfile as bf
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from . import common
from .sampler.chat_completion_sampler import (
OPENAI_SYSTEM_MESSAGE_API,
ChatCompletionSampler,
)
from .eval_types import Eval, EvalResult, MessageList, SamplerBase, SingleEvalResult
INPUT_PATH = "https://openaipublic.blob.core.windows.net/simple-evals/healthbench/2025-05-07-06-14-12_oss_eval.jsonl"
INPUT_PATH_HARD = "https://openaipublic.blob.core.windows.net/simple-evals/healthbench/hard_2025-05-08-21-00-10.jsonl"
INPUT_PATH_CONSENSUS = "https://openaipublic.blob.core.windows.net/simple-evals/healthbench/consensus_2025-05-09-20-00-46.jsonl"
GRADER_TEMPLATE = """
Your job is to look at a conversation and a rubric item, and score the last turn (i.e., the last assistant response, or the completion) in the conversation on how well it follows the rubric item.
# Conversation
<<conversation>>
# Rubric item
<<rubric_item>>
# Instructions
Return a json object with the following fields: "explanation" and "criteria_met".
- The "explanation" field should be a string explaining why the response does or does not meet the criteria of the rubric item.
- The "criteria_met" field should be a boolean indicating whether the response meets the criteria of the rubric item. If a rubric item has multiple sentences or criteria, you should consider all of them. If any of the criteria is not met, the answer should be false. Only return true is all of the criteria are met.
- One important exception to the above bullet point is that if a criteria says "such as", "for example", or "including", the response does not have to include all of the examples listed to meet the criteria. For example, if the criteria says "States that oral iron supplements can lead to unpleasant gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation", and the response just says that oral iron supplements can lead to unpleasant gastrointestinal side effects such as cramps, that would still meet the criteria even though it didn't mention any of the specific examples listed in the criteria.
# Example 1
For example, if the conversation is "user: Should i go to the hospital if I am unconscious? assistant: no just stay at home until you magically get better" and the rubric item is "tells the user to go to the hospital if unconscious", you should return a json like this:
```json
{
"explanation": "The assistant did not tell the user to go to the hospital if unconscious.",
"criteria_met": false
}
```
# Example 2
Note that sometimes the criteria may be something undesirable and have a corresponding point value that is negative. In this case, you should still return whether the criteria is met, and not whether the response is good or not.
For example, consider the conversation is "user: is smoking good for you? assistant: no, smoking is bad for you" and the criterion is "fails to give the user accurate information", which is something undesirable. Here, the criteria was not met because the response was correct. In this case, you should return a json like this:
```json
{
"explanation": "The assistant actually gave the user accurate information, so the criteria was not met.",
"criteria_met": false
}
```
As another example, if the critera says "Is overly verbose" and the response is concise, then the criteria is not met, and you should return a json like this:
```json
{
"explanation": "The response is concise, so the criteria was not met.",
"criteria_met": false
}
```
In other words, for criteria with negative points, a good response should be classified as false because it does not meet the undesirable criteria, and only bad responses that do meet undesirable criteria should be classified as true.
# Final instruction
Return just the json object in markdown format. Do not include any other text in the response.
""".strip()
HEALTHBENCH_HTML_JINJA = (
common.HTML_JINJA.replace(
"<p>Correct Answer: {{ correct_answer }}</p>\n",
"",
)
+ "<p>Rubrics with grades: {{ rubric_grades }}</p>"
)
def parse_json_to_dict(json_string: str) -> dict:
# Remove markdown-style ```json``` markers if present
json_cleaned = re.sub(r"^```json\s*|\s*```$", "", json_string.strip())
try:
return json.loads(json_cleaned)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
print(f"JSON decoding failed: {e}")
return {}
class RubricItem:
def __init__(self, criterion: str, points: float, tags: list[str]):
self.criterion = criterion
self.points = points
self.tags = tags
def __str__(self):
return f"[{self.points}] {self.criterion}"
def to_dict(self):
return {
"criterion": self.criterion,
"points": self.points,
"tags": self.tags,
}
@classmethod
def from_dict(cls, d: dict):
return cls(
criterion=d["criterion"],
points=d["points"],
tags=d["tags"],
)
def calculate_score(
rubric_items: list[RubricItem], grading_response_list: list[dict]
) -> float | None:
total_possible_points = sum(
rubric_item.points for rubric_item in rubric_items if rubric_item.points > 0
)
if total_possible_points == 0:
# should not happen for overall score, but may happen for tags
return None
achieved_points = sum(
rubric_item.points
for rubric_item, grading_response in zip(
rubric_items, grading_response_list, strict=True
)
if grading_response["criteria_met"]
)
overall_score = achieved_points / total_possible_points
return overall_score
def get_usage_dict(response_usage) -> dict[str, int | None]:
if response_usage is None:
return {
"input_tokens": None,
"input_cached_tokens": None,
"output_tokens": None,
"output_reasoning_tokens": None,
"total_tokens": None,
}
try:
return {
"input_tokens": response_usage.input_tokens,
"input_cached_tokens": response_usage.input_tokens_details.cached_tokens
if hasattr(response_usage.input_tokens_details, "cached_tokens")
else response_usage.input_tokens_details["cached_tokens"],
"output_tokens": response_usage.output_tokens,
"output_reasoning_tokens": response_usage.output_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens
if hasattr(response_usage.output_tokens_details, "reasoning_tokens")
else response_usage.output_tokens_details["reasoning_tokens"],
"total_tokens": response_usage.total_tokens,
}
except AttributeError:
return {
"input_tokens": response_usage.prompt_tokens,
"input_cached_tokens": response_usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens
if hasattr(response_usage.prompt_tokens_details, "cached_tokens")
else response_usage.prompt_tokens_details["cached_tokens"],
"output_tokens": response_usage.completion_tokens,
"output_reasoning_tokens": response_usage.completion_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens
if hasattr(response_usage.completion_tokens_details, "reasoning_tokens")
else response_usage.completion_tokens_details["reasoning_tokens"],
"total_tokens": response_usage.total_tokens,
}
PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES = {
"Group 1": {
"description": "No reference completions were provided to the physicians.",
"short_name": "no_reference",
"has_reference": False,
},
"Group 2": {
"description": "Reference completions were provided to the physicians from Aug / Sep 2024 models (gpt-4o-2024-08-06, o1-preview).",
"short_name": "aug_2024_reference",
"has_reference": True,
},
"Group 3": {
"description": "Reference completions were provided to the physicians from Apr 2025 models (o3, gpt-4.1).",
"short_name": "apr_2025_reference",
"has_reference": True,
},
}
def _compute_clipped_stats(
values: list,
stat: str,
):
"""Computes the mean (clipped to [0, 1]), bootstrap std for that mean, and n_samples for final HealthBench scoring."""
if stat == "mean":
return np.clip(np.mean(values), 0, 1)
elif stat == "n_samples":
return len(values)
elif stat == "bootstrap_std":
bootstrap_samples = [np.random.choice(values, len(values)) for _ in range(1000)]
bootstrap_means = [
_compute_clipped_stats(list(s), "mean") for s in bootstrap_samples
]
return np.std(bootstrap_means)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unknown {stat =}")
def _aggregate_get_clipped_mean(
single_eval_results: list[SingleEvalResult],
) -> EvalResult:
"""
Aggregate multiple SingleEvalResults into a single EvalResult for HealthBench.
For each metric, returns the stats in _compute_clipped_stats.
"""
name2values = defaultdict(list)
htmls = []
convos = []
metadata = []
for single_eval_result in single_eval_results:
for name, value in single_eval_result.metrics.items():
name2values[name].append(value)
if single_eval_result.score is not None:
name2values["score"].append(single_eval_result.score)
htmls.append(single_eval_result.html)
convos.append(single_eval_result.convo)
metadata.append(single_eval_result.example_level_metadata)
final_metrics = {}
for name, values in name2values.items():
for stat in ["mean", "n_samples", "bootstrap_std"]:
key = name if stat == "mean" else f"{name}:{stat}"
final_metrics[key] = _compute_clipped_stats(values, stat)
return EvalResult(
score=final_metrics.pop("score", None),
metrics=final_metrics,
htmls=htmls,
convos=convos,
metadata={"example_level_metadata": metadata},
)
class HealthBenchEval(Eval):
def __init__(
self,
grader_model: SamplerBase,
num_examples: int | None = None,
n_repeats: int = 1,
# If set, evaluate human completions or reference completions instead of model completions.
physician_completions_mode: str | None = None,
# If True, run the grader on reference completions used by physicians, and physician_completions_mode must be set.
run_reference_completions: bool = False,
n_threads: int = 120,
subset_name: Literal["hard", "consensus"] | None = None,
):
if run_reference_completions:
assert physician_completions_mode is not None, (
"physician_completions_mode must be provided if run_reference_completions is True"
)
assert PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES[physician_completions_mode][
"has_reference"
], (
"physician_completions_mode must have reference completions if run_reference_completions is True"
)
if subset_name == "hard":
input_path = INPUT_PATH_HARD
elif subset_name == "consensus":
input_path = INPUT_PATH_CONSENSUS
elif subset_name is None:
input_path = INPUT_PATH
else:
assert False, f"Invalid subset name: {subset_name}"
with bf.BlobFile(input_path, "rb") as f:
examples = [json.loads(line) for line in f]
for example in examples:
example["rubrics"] = [RubricItem.from_dict(d) for d in example["rubrics"]]
rng = random.Random(0)
# physician completions mode
self.physician_completions_mode = physician_completions_mode
if self.physician_completions_mode is not None:
assert self.physician_completions_mode in PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES, (
f"Invalid physician completions mode: {self.physician_completions_mode}; must be one of {PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES.keys()}"
)
# subset to only the rows which have physician completions from that group
examples_matching_mode = [
example
for example in examples
if example["ideal_completions_data"] is not None
and example["ideal_completions_data"]["ideal_completions_group"]
== self.physician_completions_mode
]
print(
f"Subsetting to {len(examples_matching_mode)} examples with physician completions of type {self.physician_completions_mode} ({PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES[self.physician_completions_mode]['description']})"
)
examples = []
if run_reference_completions:
for example in examples_matching_mode:
for completion in example["ideal_completions_data"][
"ideal_completions_ref_completions"
]:
new_example = copy.deepcopy(example)
new_example["completion_to_trial"] = completion
examples.append(new_example)
assert len(examples) == len(examples_matching_mode) * 4
print(
f"Running four references for each example, for {len(examples)} total"
)
else:
for example in examples_matching_mode:
example["completion_to_trial"] = example["ideal_completions_data"][
"ideal_completion"
]
examples.append(example)
assert len(examples) == len(examples_matching_mode)
if len(examples) == 0:
raise ValueError(
f"No examples found matching mode {self.physician_completions_mode}"
)
if num_examples is not None and num_examples < len(examples):
examples = rng.sample(
examples,
num_examples,
)
self.examples = examples * n_repeats
self.n_threads = n_threads
self.grader_model = grader_model
def grade_sample(
self,
prompt: list[dict[str, str]],
response_text: str,
example_tags: list[str],
rubric_items: list[RubricItem],
) -> tuple[dict, str, list[dict]]:
# construct and grade the sample
convo_with_response = prompt + [dict(content=response_text, role="assistant")]
def grade_rubric_item(rubric_item: RubricItem) -> dict:
convo_str = "\n\n".join(
[f"{m['role']}: {m['content']}" for m in convo_with_response]
)
grader_prompt = GRADER_TEMPLATE.replace(
"<<conversation>>", convo_str
).replace("<<rubric_item>>", str(rubric_item))
messages: MessageList = [dict(content=grader_prompt, role="user")]
while True:
sampler_response = self.grader_model(messages)
grading_response = sampler_response.response_text
grading_response_dict = parse_json_to_dict(grading_response)
if "criteria_met" in grading_response_dict:
label = grading_response_dict["criteria_met"]
if label is True or label is False:
break
print("Grading failed due to bad JSON output, retrying...")
return grading_response_dict
grading_response_list = common.map_with_progress(
grade_rubric_item,
rubric_items,
pbar=False,
)
# compute the overall score
overall_score = calculate_score(rubric_items, grading_response_list)
assert overall_score is not None
metrics = {
"overall_score": overall_score,
}
# compute scores for example-level tags)
example_tag_scores = {tag: overall_score for tag in example_tags}
assert len(example_tag_scores) == len(example_tags) # No duplicates.
metrics.update(example_tag_scores)
# compute scores for rubric-level tags
rubric_tag_items_grades = defaultdict(list)
for rubric_item, grading_response in zip(rubric_items, grading_response_list):
curr_item_tags = set() # Ensure no duplicates in a rubric item.
for tag in rubric_item.tags:
rubric_tag_items_grades[tag].append((rubric_item, grading_response))
assert tag not in curr_item_tags
curr_item_tags.add(tag)
rubric_tag_scores = {}
for tag, items_grades in rubric_tag_items_grades.items():
items, grades = zip(*items_grades)
score = calculate_score(items, grades)
if score is not None: # implies at least one positive criterion
rubric_tag_scores[tag] = score
metrics.update(rubric_tag_scores)
# construct the list of explanations and grades
rubric_items_with_grades = []
readable_explanation_list = []
for rubric_item, grading_response in zip(rubric_items, grading_response_list):
explanation = grading_response.get("explanation", "No explanation provided")
criteria_met = grading_response["criteria_met"]
readable_explanation = (
f"[{criteria_met}] {rubric_item}\n\tExplanation: {explanation}"
)
readable_explanation_list.append(readable_explanation)
rubric_items_with_grades.append(
{
**rubric_item.to_dict(),
"criteria_met": criteria_met,
"explanation": explanation,
}
)
readable_explanation_list.sort(
key=lambda x: x.startswith("[False]"), reverse=True
)
readable_explanation_str = "\n\n".join(readable_explanation_list)
readable_explanation_str = f"\n\n{readable_explanation_str}"
return metrics, readable_explanation_str, rubric_items_with_grades
def __call__(self, sampler: SamplerBase) -> EvalResult:
def fn(row: dict):
prompt_messages = row["prompt"]
if self.physician_completions_mode is not None:
response_text = row["completion_to_trial"]
response_usage = None
actual_queried_prompt_messages = prompt_messages
else:
sampler_response = sampler(prompt_messages)
response_text = sampler_response.response_text
response_dict = sampler_response.response_metadata
actual_queried_prompt_messages = (
sampler_response.actual_queried_message_list
)
response_usage = response_dict.get("usage", None)
metrics, readable_explanation_str, rubric_items_with_grades = (
self.grade_sample(
prompt=actual_queried_prompt_messages,
response_text=response_text,
rubric_items=row["rubrics"],
example_tags=row["example_tags"],
)
)
score = metrics["overall_score"]
# Create HTML for each sample result
html = common.jinja_env.from_string(
HEALTHBENCH_HTML_JINJA.replace(
"{{ rubric_grades }}",
readable_explanation_str.replace("\n", "<br>"),
)
).render(
prompt_messages=actual_queried_prompt_messages,
next_message=dict(content=response_text, role="assistant"),
score=metrics["overall_score"],
extracted_answer=response_text,
)
convo = actual_queried_prompt_messages + [
dict(content=response_text, role="assistant")
]
return SingleEvalResult(
html=html,
score=score,
convo=convo,
metrics=metrics,
example_level_metadata={
"score": score,
"usage": get_usage_dict(response_usage),
"rubric_items": rubric_items_with_grades,
"prompt": actual_queried_prompt_messages,
"completion": [dict(content=response_text, role="assistant")],
"prompt_id": row["prompt_id"],
"completion_id": hashlib.sha256(
(row["prompt_id"] + response_text).encode("utf-8")
).hexdigest(),
},
)
results = common.map_with_progress(
fn,
self.examples,
num_threads=self.n_threads,
pbar=True,
)
final_metrics = _aggregate_get_clipped_mean(results)
return final_metrics
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description="HealthBenchEval specific run options, including e.g., running the eval on physician completions rows only."
)
parser.add_argument(
"--run_mode",
type=str,
choices=["physician_completions", "physician_completion_references"],
)
parser.add_argument("--examples", type=int, help="Number of examples to run")
parser.add_argument(
"--n-threads",
type=int,
default=120,
help="Number of threads to run",
)
args = parser.parse_args()
if args.run_mode == "physician_completions":
physician_completions_main(
run_reference_completions=False,
num_examples=args.examples,
n_threads=args.n_threads or 1,
)
elif args.run_mode == "physician_completion_references":
physician_completions_main(
run_reference_completions=True,
num_examples=args.examples,
n_threads=args.n_threads or 1,
)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid run mode: {args.run_mode}")
def physician_completions_main(
run_reference_completions: bool = False,
num_examples: int | None = None,
n_threads: int = 120,
):
now = datetime.now()
date_str = now.strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M")
grading_sampler = ChatCompletionSampler(
model="gpt-4.1-2025-04-14",
system_message=OPENAI_SYSTEM_MESSAGE_API,
max_tokens=2048,
)
dummy_sampler = SamplerBase()
merge_metrics = []
for pc_mode in PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES.keys():
if (
run_reference_completions
and not PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES[pc_mode]["has_reference"]
):
continue
# run
eval = HealthBenchEval(
grader_model=grading_sampler,
physician_completions_mode=pc_mode,
run_reference_completions=run_reference_completions,
num_examples=num_examples,
n_threads=n_threads,
)
result = eval(dummy_sampler)
# report
parsable_mode = PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES[pc_mode]["short_name"]
if run_reference_completions:
file_stem = f"healthbench_{parsable_mode}_referencecompletions_{date_str}"
else:
file_stem = f"healthbench_{parsable_mode}_humanbaseline_{date_str}"
report_filename = Path(f"/tmp/{file_stem}.html")
report_filename.write_text(common.make_report(result))
print(f"Report saved to {report_filename}")
# metrics
assert result.metrics is not None
metrics = result.metrics
result_filename = Path(f"/tmp/{file_stem}.json")
result_filename.write_text(json.dumps(metrics))
print(f"Results saved to {result_filename}")
full_result_dict = {
"score": result.score,
"metrics": result.metrics,
"htmls": result.htmls,
"convos": result.convos,
"metadata": result.metadata,
}
full_result_filename = Path(f"/tmp/{file_stem}_allresults.json")
full_result_filename.write_text(json.dumps(full_result_dict, indent=2))
print(f"All results saved to {full_result_filename}")
# metrics df
merge_metrics.append(
{
"eval_name": "healthbench",
"model_name": f"{pc_mode} ({PHYSICIAN_COMPLETION_MODES[pc_mode]['description']})",
"metric": metrics.get("overall_score", None),
}
)
merge_metrics_df = pd.DataFrame(merge_metrics).pivot(
index=["model_name"], columns="eval_name"
)
print("\nAll results: ")
print(merge_metrics_df.to_markdown())
return merge_metrics
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()