Skip to content

Commit 8d8ef9a

Browse files
committed
docs: add Phase 5 implementation plan for environment state management
Create comprehensive implementation plan for integrating type-safe state management into commands with 4 subtasks: **Subtask 1: Preparatory Refactoring** - Extract logical phases from command execute() methods - Remove redundant dependencies - Add error context extraction helpers - Setup repository infrastructure in Container - Add 7 tests (2 unit + 5 integration for repository/locking) **Subtask 2: Document Architectural Decision (ADR)** - Create ADR for command state return pattern - Document rationale for typed returns vs pure command handler - Explain alternatives considered and consequences **Subtask 3: Update ProvisionCommand** - Accept Environment<Created>, return Environment<Provisioned> - Integrate state transitions (Provisioning, Provisioned, ProvisionFailed) - Add persistence integration with graceful error handling - Update Container factory and E2E binaries (breaking change) - Add 7 unit tests for state management **Subtask 4: Update ConfigureCommand** - Accept Environment<Provisioned>, return Environment<Configured> - Integrate state transitions (Configuring, Configured, ConfigureFailed) - Add persistence integration with graceful error handling - Update Container factory and E2E binaries (breaking change) - Add 7 unit tests for state management **Key Features:** - Compile-time prevention of invalid state transitions - Automatic state persistence after each transition - Error states with failed step context for recovery guidance - Graceful handling of persistence failures - Per-environment file locking (30-second timeout) - Complete integration with Container DI and E2E tests **Test Impact:** 663 → 684 tests (+21 total) **Dependencies:** Phases 1-4 complete (type-state pattern, logging, serialization, persistence layer with file locking) Includes comprehensive integration considerations covering state file management, concurrent execution, error recovery, repository configuration, logging/observability, and compile-time type safety demonstrations.
1 parent 51ad228 commit 8d8ef9a

File tree

3 files changed

+1673
-2
lines changed

3 files changed

+1673
-2
lines changed

docs/features/environment-state-management/implementation-plan/README.md

Lines changed: 46 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -125,17 +125,17 @@
125125

126126
### 📅 Phase 5: Command Integration (PLANNED)
127127

128-
**Goal**: Update commands to use type-safe state transitions and orchestration.
128+
**Goal**: Update commands to use type-safe state transitions and state persistence.
129129

130130
**Status**: 📅 Planned for future implementation
131131

132132
**Key Deliverables**:
133133

134134
- Commands accept and return specific state types
135135
- Type-safe state transitions in command execution
136-
- Orchestration layer for chaining commands
137136
- Error state handling with compile-time guarantees
138137
- State persistence during command execution
138+
- Graceful handling of persistence failures
139139

140140
---
141141

@@ -319,3 +319,47 @@ The entire feature is considered complete when:
319319
- ✅ Manual recovery documentation is complete (Phase 6 - CRITICAL)
320320
- ✅ Documentation is comprehensive
321321
- ✅ User feedback is incorporated
322+
323+
---
324+
325+
## 🔮 Future Enhancements (Beyond Phase 6)
326+
327+
After completing the core Environment State Management feature, consider these enhancements:
328+
329+
### Command Orchestration Layer
330+
331+
Build a high-level `DeploymentOrchestrator` that chains commands with compile-time state validation:
332+
333+
```rust
334+
// Example fluent API
335+
let configured = orchestrator
336+
.provision(environment).await?
337+
.configure()?;
338+
339+
// Or full workflow method
340+
let configured = orchestrator
341+
.provision_and_configure(environment).await?;
342+
```
343+
344+
**Benefits**:
345+
346+
- Type-safe command chaining with compile-time guarantees
347+
- Simplified API for common workflows
348+
- Centralized error handling across commands
349+
- Better separation of concerns (commands focus on their task, orchestrator handles workflow)
350+
351+
**Trade-offs**:
352+
353+
- Additional layer of abstraction
354+
- More complex dependency injection
355+
- May obscure individual command execution for debugging
356+
357+
**Decision**: Deferred to future work. Phase 5 focuses on getting commands to persist state correctly. Orchestration can be added later when the need for complex workflows becomes clear.
358+
359+
### Additional Future Work
360+
361+
- **CLI Development**: Create user-facing CLI that leverages the orchestrator
362+
- **Advanced Recovery**: Implement automatic detection and recovery from interrupted operations
363+
- **State Validation**: Add infrastructure state validation against stored state
364+
- **Event Sourcing**: Track full transition history for audit and replay
365+
- **Multi-Environment Dashboard**: Visual tool to monitor multiple environment states

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)