chore: update Claude code review workflow configuration

Enhance the Claude code review workflow by allowing any bot to trigger reviews and adding accessibility to the review criteria. Adjust the feedback prompt to emphasize conciseness and constructiveness. Clean up unnecessary whitespace for better readability.

Author: trurl-master

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ jobs:
     #   github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'external-contributor' ||
     #   github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'new-developer' ||
     #   github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR'
-    
+
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     permissions:
       contents: read
       pull-requests: read
       issues: read
       id-token: write
-    
+
     steps:
       - name: Checkout repository
         uses: actions/checkout@v4
@@ -39,40 +39,43 @@ jobs:
 
           # Optional: Specify model (defaults to Claude Sonnet 4, uncomment for Claude Opus 4)
           # model: "claude-opus-4-20250514"
-          
+
+          # Allow any bot to trigger the review
+          allowed_bots: '*'
+
           # Direct prompt for automated review (no @claude mention needed)
           direct_prompt: |
             Please review this pull request and provide feedback on:
             - Code quality and best practices
+            - Accessibility
             - Potential bugs or issues
             - Performance considerations
             - Security concerns
             - Test coverage
-            
-            Be constructive and helpful in your feedback.
+
+            Be concise and constructive in your feedback.
 
           # Optional: Use sticky comments to make Claude reuse the same comment on subsequent pushes to the same PR
           # use_sticky_comment: true
-          
+
           # Optional: Customize review based on file types
           # direct_prompt: |
           #   Review this PR focusing on:
           #   - For TypeScript files: Type safety and proper interface usage
           #   - For API endpoints: Security, input validation, and error handling
           #   - For React components: Performance, accessibility, and best practices
           #   - For tests: Coverage, edge cases, and test quality
-          
+
           # Optional: Different prompts for different authors
           # direct_prompt: |
-          #   ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' && 
+          #   ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' &&
           #   'Welcome! Please review this PR from a first-time contributor. Be encouraging and provide detailed explanations for any suggestions.' ||
           #   'Please provide a thorough code review focusing on our coding standards and best practices.' }}
-          
+
           # Optional: Add specific tools for running tests or linting
           # allowed_tools: "Bash(npm run test),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run typecheck)"
-          
+
           # Optional: Skip review for certain conditions
           # if: |
           #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[skip-review]') &&
           #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[WIP]')
-