Skip to content

ASSISTment 2009 description - chronological orderingย #13

@MrMaks

Description

@MrMaks

๐Ÿ“š Documentation

Hi. In the notebook for analysis of ASSISTment 2009, it is mentioned that order_id column is non-chronological, which is in contradiction to the original website of ASSISTment.

image
(Source: https://sites.google.com/site/assistmentsdata/how-to-interpret)

Since I see no explicit timestamp column for 2009 dataset, nor have I found any paper explicitly stating it, can you confirm whether the order_id column can be treated as chronological ordering of the time series for each individual user? This ordering matters while creating the time series for actions taken by each user (I did not find code for tripple line formatting of this dataset version anywhere as to confirm whether order_id is in fact correct).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions