Why --insecure flag was removed

[PRNDA]

I don't understand why this useful flag was removed. Do we have it back?

[txthinking]

you mean: brook link --insecure ?

…

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM PRNDA(A for Auto) ***@***.***> wrote: *PRNDA* created an issue (txthinking/brook#1387) <#1387> I don't understand why this useful flag was removed. Do we have it back? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1387>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJPFT7YKII7JG7XR5PV3DD4CIDWLAVCNFSM6AAAAACPMC3OUCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZTG42DCMJSGMYDOOA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PRNDA]

you mean: brook link --insecure ?
…

brook wssserver --insecure and brook relayoverbrook --insecure

BTW, I know I can achieve this with brook relayoverbrook --link 'brook://wssserver?insecure=true&...', but sometimes a simple --insecure is a far more convenient way.