Unlisted Lobby overwrite should be replaced with additional lobby type

[geringverdien]

The patch from #42 opted to not replace the Unlisted type but rather make a new one, looking back this should be re-implemented for cases such as twitch streamers using Unlisted lobbies for viewers or dedicated servers in "early access"/private stages

A vanilla compatible, clientsided way to make Unlisted lobbies more secure would be to add a warning label stating the public accessibility of such lobbies

[binury]

The patch from #42 opted to not replace the Unlisted type but rather make a new one, looking back this should be re-implemented for cases such as twitch streamers using Unlisted lobbies for viewers or dedicated servers in "early access"/private stages

A vanilla compatible, clientsided way to make Unlisted lobbies more secure would be to add a warning label stating the public accessibility of such lobbies

This was a reversion to the original privacy of unlisted rooms (changed to current form in an early patch). Should UWP's fix be identified as an issue by player reports we may reconsider.

E.g., adding a checkbox within the create-lobby window, when unlisted is selected, to toggle the insecure listing (and code functionality) could provide both the choice and disclosure that you have suggested here.