SPDX identifiers
#1296
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
No thoughts, I have never heard about SPDX. Sounds like maybe a good idea in princpile, but I don't really know.
…--p
On 25. 11. 2025, at 9:53, Ondřej Košarko ***@***.***> wrote:
Should we use (or capture) also the spdx (https://spdx.org/licenses/) identifiers for licenses (where possible)?
@stranak <https://github.com/stranak> thoughts?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1296>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC2TIXNURECJAI525IHBAL36QKKPAVCNFSM6AAAAACNDYBUAOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZZGE3TKNRZGE>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Should we use (or capture) also the spdx (https://spdx.org/licenses/) identifiers for licenses (where possible)?
@stranak thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions