Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
@bmharper yes good question. I think it makes sense to unify the behaviour. Can you please submit a PR for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It took me some debugging to figure out that
AutoShapehas different behaviour when the input is atensorvs a filename or a PIL Image. Specifically, when you feedAutoShapeatensor, then it skips the NMS and other post-processing, and just returns the rawtensoroutput.I was wondering if it's worthwhile creating a PR which makes this behaviour optional, or perhaps if there is a place where we can document this?
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions