You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/site/index/process.md
+17-7Lines changed: 17 additions & 7 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -25,13 +25,23 @@ The [UTS #35: Locale Data Markup Language (LDML)](https://www.unicode.org/report
25
25
- Requests for changes are entered in the bug/feature request database ([file a ticket](/requesting_changes#how-to-file-a-ticket)).
26
26
- Structural changes are always backwards-compatible. That is, previous files will continue to work. Deprecated elements remain, although their usage is strongly discouraged.
27
27
- There is a standing policy for structural changes that require non-trivial code for proper implementation, such as time zone fallback or alias mechanisms. These require design discussions in the [CLDR Design Working Group](https://cldr.unicode.org/cldr-tc/design-wg) and approval by the [CLDR Technical Committee](https://cldr.unicode.org/cldr-tc). Complex changes may require prototypes that demonstrate correct function according to the proposed specification.
28
-
- New sections may be added to the specification with the status of _Technical Preview_ or _Final Candidate_. That depends on how comprehensive the new section is, what type of feedback the Technical Committee requires, and whether the feedback period needs to extend across one or more releases. These terms mean:
29
-
-**Technical Preview** - The specification section is fairly complete but not stable, included in the release to gather feedback.
30
-
Features may be modified or removed based upon feedback.
31
-
A section in Technical Preview may remain in Technical Preview in the following release if more feedback is needed, or could advance to Final Candidate or to stable.
32
-
It is similar to elements marked with [@TECHPREVIEW in the DTD as described in the LDML](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#dtd-annotations).
33
-
- **Final Candidate** - The specification section is complete and considered ready for release, and is expected to become stable in the next release. An optional Final Candidate stage follows a period of feedback in Technical Preview where final feedback is desired. Changes will only be made if serious issues are discovered during this feedback period.
34
-
- **Stable** - The specification section has been approved as stable by the Technical Committee, any changes must be backward compatible. Deprecated elements will remain, although their usage is strongly discouraged.
28
+
- New sections may be added to the specification with the status of _Technical Preview_ or _Final Candidate_. That depends on how comprehensive the new section is, what type of feedback the Technical Committee requires, and whether the feedback period needs to extend across one or more releases.
29
+
30
+
- When a spec change or clarification affects existing ICU APIs, CLDR will discuss the change with ICU and an ICU member be a required reviewer on the pull request.
31
+
32
+
- New spec features will be marked as Tech Preview if the following conditions are true:
33
+
34
+
- They are intended for implementation in ICU (eg excluding annotations for emoji, etc)
35
+
36
+
- They make compliant pre-existing ICU APIs become non-compliant
37
+
38
+
- They won’t be implemented by ICU (in at least draft status) in the synchronized releases
39
+
40
+
|**Status**|**Description**|
41
+
|---|:---|
42
+
|*Technical Preview*| - The specification section is fairly complete but not stable, included in the release to gather feedback. <br>- Features may be modified or removed based upon feedback. <br>A section in Technical Preview may remain in Technical Preview in the following release if more feedback is needed, or could advance to Final Candidate or to stable.<br>- It is similar to elements marked with [@TECHPREVIEW in the DTD as described in the LDML](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#dtd-annotations). |
43
+
|*Final Candidate*| - The specification section is complete and considered ready for release, and is expected to become stable in the next release. An optional Final Candidate stage follows a period of feedback in Technical Preview where final feedback is desired. Changes will only be made if serious issues are discovered during this feedback period. |
44
+
|*Stable*| - The specification section has been approved as stable by the Technical Committee, any changes must be backward compatible. Deprecated elements will remain, although their usage is strongly discouraged. |
0 commit comments