You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/site/index/process.md
+6-2Lines changed: 6 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ title: CLDR Process
8
8
9
9
This document describes the Unicode CLDR Technical Committee's process for data collection, resolution, public feedback and release.
10
10
11
-
- The process is designed to be light-weight; in particular, the meetings are frequent, short, and informal. Most of the work is by email or phone, with a database recording requested changes (See [Requesting Changes](/requesting_changes)).
11
+
- The process is designed to be light-weight; in particular, the meetings are frequent, short, and informal. Most of the work is by email or virtual meeting, with a database recording requested changes (See [Requesting Changes](/requesting_changes)).
12
12
- When gathering data for a region and language, it is important to have multiple sources for that data to produce the most commonly used data. The initial versions of the data were based on best available sources, and updates with new and improvements are released twice a year with work by contributors inside and outside of the Unicode Consortium.
13
13
- It is important to note that CLDR is a Repository, not a Registration. That is, contributors should NOT expect that their suggestions will simply be adopted into the repository; instead, it will be vetted by other contributors.
14
14
- The [CLDR Survey Tool](https://st.unicode.org) is the main channel for collecting data, and bug/feature requests are tracked in a database ([file a ticket](/requesting_changes#how-to-file-a-ticket)).
@@ -25,7 +25,11 @@ The [UTS #35: Locale Data Markup Language (LDML)](https://www.unicode.org/report
25
25
- Requests for changes are entered in the bug/feature request database ([file a ticket](/requesting_changes#how-to-file-a-ticket)).
26
26
- Structural changes are always backwards-compatible. That is, previous files will continue to work. Deprecated elements remain, although their usage is strongly discouraged.
27
27
- There is a standing policy for structural changes that require non-trivial code for proper implementation, such as time zone fallback or alias mechanisms. These require design discussions in the [CLDR Design Working Group](https://cldr.unicode.org/cldr-tc/design-wg) and approval by the [CLDR Technical Committee](https://cldr.unicode.org/cldr-tc) that demonstrates correct function according to the proposed specification.
28
-
- New sections maybe added to the specification in Techical Preview, Final Candidate depending on how finalized the new section is, what type of feedback the TC requires, and whether the feedback period needs to extend across one or more releases.
28
+
- New sections may be added to the specification in Techical Preview, Final Candidate depending on how finalized the new section is, what type of feedback the TC requires, and whether the feedback period needs to extend across one or more releases.
29
+
-**Technical Preview** - Specification section have been approved by the CLDR Technical Committee and open for feedback. New features may be modified or removed similar to elements marked with [@TECHPREVIEW in the DTD as described in the LDML](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#dtd-annotations).
30
+
-**Final Candidate** - Specification section has been finalized and approved by the CLDR Technical Committee and is expected to become a part of the stable specification in the next release. An optional Final Candidate stage follows a period of feedback in Technical Preview stage for one or more releases where additional feedback is still desired. Changes will only be made if serious issues are discovered during this feedback period.
0 commit comments