-
|
I noticed that for example Can you please give a little bit more information about the removal and maybe confirm that this was intentional and not maybe a mistake while doing some other changes? Thanks. Ben. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Hi, Thanks for the question. The commit message may be a little misleading, but the removal was intentional. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I put most of them back but marked them |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi, Thanks for the question. The commit message may be a little misleading, but the removal was intentional.
This page from the UK, less than a year old, tries to clarify some of these changes. According to the SI Brochure, there are 15 Non-SI units accepted for use with SI. The
NonSIclass tries to reflect that.It still has a few extra units, that strictly speaking do not belong there. Where there are not declarations in UCUM or elsewhere, we consider putting them e.g. into a new class under the systems.uom.common.historic package.