Labels, styling, links, small changes

[daaronr]

1. Spacing and font size: The content at the top is taking a bit too much space on my monitor, less room left for the visualization. [Minor]

Maybe make the 'middle text' (E.g. "Below we show the distribution of evaluators’ answers to detailed, quantitative questions about different aspects of the research. For more information on these questions...") a bit smaller or less wordy?

2. "Questions" -- how well do you think the word "questions" conveys what this is? I usually call them 'Criteria'. And then "Ratings" might be labeled "Overall Ratings". We have room in that tab bar to these labels longer, at least on a laptop [Minor]

3. Let's hyperlink the guidelines (https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/policies-projects-evaluation-workflow/evaluation/guidelines-for-evaluators#overall-assessment) on that description line of the ratings table.

And maybe reword it as

Below: The 'overall assessment' for each paper, averaging evaluators' research quality percentile scores (details).

[hughjonesd]

I've done everything except try to mess with the spacing. It seems trivial but bitter experience tells me that I can spend hours failing to improve a design... my design fu is weak and you are always trying to drill through different layers (shiny, bootstrap, CSS....)

[daaronr]

This is great, thanks!

[daaronr]

Wait, reopening @hughjonesd bc we never addressed the capitalization issue.

Done. Tell me what you want with axis text, it looks ok from here.

Side labels: The capitalization is also off. Title Case I guess. So don't capitalize "of".

But do capitalize abbreviations/acronyms like "LT" (long term), "AI", and "LMICs"

@hughjonesd

[hughjonesd]

The capitalisation was on a different issue and I addressed it there.

[hughjonesd]

See #27 (comment)