-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy path2chap8.tex
More file actions
304 lines (297 loc) · 16.7 KB
/
2chap8.tex
File metadata and controls
304 lines (297 loc) · 16.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
\chapter{Canonical Quantization of the Dirac Field}
\section{Conjugate momenta and canonical anti-comutation relations}
Now we canonically quantize the Dirac Field. We calculate the conjugate momentum
\begin{equation}
\Pi^\beta=\pdv{\mathcal{L}}{(\partial_0\Psi_\beta)}
\end{equation}
from the Dirac Field Lagrangian (\ref{dirac_lagrangian}) $$\mathcal{L}=i\Bar{\Psi}\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu\Psi-m\Bar{\Psi}\Psi$$
and get
\begin{equation}
\Pi^\beta=i\Bar{\Psi}_\delta(\gamma^0)^{\delta\beta}.
\label{can_mom_dirac}
\end{equation}
The canonical anti-commutation relations
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\pb{\Psi_\alpha(t,\vb{x})}{\Psi_\beta(t,\vb{y})}&=0\\
\pb{\Psi_\alpha(t,\vb{x})}{\Pi^\beta(t,\vb{y})}&=i\delta_\alpha^\beta\delta^3(\vb{x}-\vb{y})
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
with canonical momentum (\ref{can_mom_dirac}) and bearing in mind that $(\gamma^0)^2=I$ read
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\pb{\Psi_\alpha(t,\vb{x})}{\Psi_\beta(t,\vb{y})}&=0\\
\pb{\Psi_\alpha(t,\vb{x})}{\Bar{\Psi}_\beta(t,\vb{y})}&=(\gamma^0)_{\alpha\beta}\delta^3(\vb{x}-\vb{y})
\end{aligned}
\label{anticomm_dirac}
\end{equation}
\section{The Dirac field mode expansion}
Now we focus on solving the equation of motion, the Dirac Equation:
\begin{equation*}
(-i\slashed{\partial}+m)\Psi=0.
\end{equation*}
Where we are introducing the \textit{Feynman slash} notation to indicate scalar products between 4-vectors and gamma matrices, that is, $\slashed{\partial}=\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu$. To get insight about the solutions to the Dirac equation, note that acting with $(i\slashed{\partial}+m)$ on it gives
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
(\slashed{\partial}\slashed{\partial}+m^2)\Psi=0.
\end{aligned}
\label{dirac_reit}
\end{equation}
Now, since $\slashed{\partial}\slashed{\partial}=\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu\partial_\mu\partial_\nu$ and $\partial_\mu$ and $\partial_\nu$ commute, we can replace $\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu$ by its symmetric part $\frac{1}{2}\pb{\gamma^\mu}{\gamma^\nu}=-g^{\mu\nu}$. So $\slashed{\partial}\slashed{\partial}=- \partial^2$ and (\ref{dirac_reit}) is nothing but the Klein-Gordon equation. This tells us that $\Psi$ is also a solution to the Klein-Gordon equation, so it can be expanded in terms of plane-wave modes
\begin{equation}
\Psi(x)=u(\vb{p})e^{ipx}+v(\vb{p})e^{-ipx}
\end{equation}
where $u(\vb{p})$ and $v(\vb{p})$ are four-component constant bispinors. Plugging this ansatz into the Dirac Equaton gives $(\slashed{p}+m)u(\vb{p})e^{ipx}+(-\slashed{p}+m)v(\vb{p})e^{-ipx}=0$ so we must simultaneously satisfy
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
(\slashed{p}+m)u(\vb{p})&=0\\
(-\slashed{p}+m)v(\vb{p})&=0.
\end{aligned}
\label{uv}
\end{equation}
These two equations have two linearly independent solutions $u_{\pm}(\vb{p})$ and $v_{\pm}(\vb{p})$ so the mode expansion for the Dirac field must be
\begin{equation}
\Psi(x)=\sum_{s=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\qty[b_s(\vb{p})u_s(\vb{p})e^{ipx}+d^\dagger_s(\vb{p})v_s(\vb{p})e^{-ipx}]
\label{dirac_mode_expansion}
\end{equation}
where, as usual, $\widetilde{\dd p}=\frac{\dd^3 p}{(2\pi)^3 2\omega}$ is the Lorentz Invariant integration measure, $\omega=\sqrt{\vb{p}^2+m^2}$, $b_s(\vb{p})$ and $d^\dagger_s(\vb{p})$ are coefficients to be interpreted as creation and annihilation operators upon quantization.\\
As for the solutions to (\ref{uv}), we label them in the rest frame $\vb{p}=\vb{0}$ by $u_{\pm}(\vb{0})$ and $v_{\pm}(\vb{0})$, and we distinguish them by their spin along the $z$-axis, indicated by their eigenvalues upon the action of $S_z$
\begin{equation}
S_{z}=\frac{i}{4}\left[\gamma^{1}, \gamma^{2}\right]=\frac{i}{2} \gamma^{1} \gamma^{2}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
\frac{1}{2} \sigma_{3} & 0 \\
0 & \frac{1}{2} \sigma_{3}
\end{array}\right).
\end{equation}
We require
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
S_z u_{\pm}(\vb{0})&=\pm\frac{1}{2}u_{\pm}(\vb{0})\\
S_z v_{\pm}(\vb{0})&=\mp\frac{1}{2}v_{\pm}(\vb{0}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
A choice that guarantees that both $b^\dagger_{+}$ and $d^\dagger_{+}$ create spin up particles along the $z$-axis \cite{srednicki2007quantum}. In the rest frame $\slashed{p}=p_\mu\gamma^\mu=p_0\gamma^0=-m\gamma^0$ so equations (\ref{uv}) reduce to
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
m(-\gamma^0+I_4)u_s(\vb{0})&=m\left(\begin{array}{cc}
I_2 & -I_2 \\
-I_2 & I_2
\end{array}\right)u_s(\vb{0})=0\\
m(\gamma^0+I_4)v_s(\vb{0})&=m\left(\begin{array}{cc}
I_2 & I_2 \\
I_2 & I_2
\end{array}\right)u_s(\vb{0})=0
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $I_n$ is the $n\times n$ identity matrix. The solutions are
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
u_{+}(\mathbf{0})=\sqrt{m}\left(\begin{array}{l}
1 \\
0 \\
1 \\
0
\end{array}\right)\qquad & u_{-}(\mathbf{0})=\sqrt{m}\left(\begin{array}{c}
0 \\
1 \\
0 \\
1
\end{array}\right) \\
v_{+}(\mathbf{0})=\sqrt{m}\left(\begin{array}{c}
0 \\
1 \\
0 \\
-1
\end{array}\right) \qquad & v_{-}(\mathbf{0})=\sqrt{m}\left(\begin{array}{c}
-1 \\
0 \\
1 \\
0
\end{array}\right) .
\end{aligned}
\label{uv_columm}
\end{equation}
As for the Barred spinors
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\Bar{u}_s(\vb{p})=&u_s^\dagger(\vb{p})\beta\\
\Bar{v}_s(\vb{p})=&v_s^\dagger(\vb{p})\beta,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\Bar{u}_{+}(\vb{0})&=\sqrt{m}(1,0,1,0)\\
\Bar{u}_{-}(\vb{0})&=\sqrt{m}(0,1,0,1)\\
\Bar{v}_{+}(\vb{0})&=\sqrt{m}(0, -1, 0,1)\\
\Bar{v}_{-}(\vb{0})&=\sqrt{m}(1 , 0 , -1 , 0).
\end{aligned}
\label{uv_row}
\end{equation}
Which are the solutions to the barred (\ref{uv}) equations
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\Bar{u}_s(\vb{p})(\slashed{p}+m)&=0\\
\Bar{v}_s(\vb{p})(-\slashed{p}+m)&=0
\end{aligned}
\label{uv_bar}
\end{equation}
since $\overline{(\slashed{p}+m)u_s(\vb{p})}=[u_s^\dagger(\vb{p})(\slashed{p}+m)]\beta=u_s^\dagger(\vb{p})\beta\beta^{-1}(\slashed{p}+m)\beta=\bar{u}_s(\vb{p})\beta(\slashed{p}+m)\beta=\Bar{u}_s(\vb{p})(\slashed{p}+m)$ where we recall that $\beta^{\text{T}}=\beta^\dagger=\beta^{-1}=\beta$ and highlight that for a general combination of gamma matrices $A$, $\Bar{A}=\beta A^\dagger\beta$.
\section{Important spinor relations}
Knowing $u_s(\vb{0})$ and $v_s(\vb{0})$, we can obtain $u_s(\vb{p})$ and $v_s(\vb{p})$ using a boost in the direction $\vu{p}=\vb{p}/\abs{\vb{p}}$, with rapidity $\eta=\abs{\vb{p}}/m$. Given the boost generator $K^j=\frac{i}{2}\gamma^j\gamma^0$, we consider the transformation
\begin{equation}
D(\Lambda)=\exp(i\eta\vu{p}\cdot\vb{K})
\end{equation}
to act on $u_s(\vb{0})$ and $v_s(\vb{0}):$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
u_s(\vb{p})&=\exp(i\eta\vu{p}\cdot \vb{K})u_s(\vb{0})\\
v_s(\vb{p})&=\exp(i\eta\vu{p}\cdot \vb{K})v_s(\vb{0}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Barring these gives
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\bar{u}_s(\vb{p})&=\bar{u}_s(0)\exp(-i\eta\vu{p}\cdot \vb{K})\\
\bar{v}_s(\vb{p})&=\bar{v}_s(0)\exp(-i\eta\vu{p}\cdot \vb{K}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
So, from these results and from (\ref{uv_columm}) and (\ref{uv_row}), we can check that
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{l}
\bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) u_{s}(\mathbf{p})=+2 m \delta_{s^{\prime} s} \\
\bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) v_{s}(\mathbf{p})=-2 m \delta_{s^{\prime} s} \\
\bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) v_{s}(\mathbf{p})=0 \\
\bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) u_{s}(\mathbf{p})=0.
\end{array}
\end{equation}
Also, noting that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\gamma^\mu\slashed{p}&=\frac{1}{2}\pb{\gamma^\mu}{\slashed{p}}+\frac{1}{2}\comm{\gamma^\mu}{\slashed{p}}=-p^\mu-2iS^{\mu\nu}p_\nu\\
\slashed{p}^\prime\gamma^\mu&=\frac{1}{2}\pb{\gamma^\mu}{\slashed{p}^\prime}-\frac{1}{2}\comm{\gamma^\mu}{\slashed{p}^\prime}=-p^{\prime\mu}+2iS^{\mu\nu}p^\prime_\nu,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
adding the first to the second, sandwiching them between $\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)$ and $u_s(\vb{p})$, noting from (\ref{uv}) that $\slashed{p}u_s(\vb{p})=-mu_s(\vb{p})$ and from (\ref{uv_bar}) that $\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)\slashed{p}=-\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)m$, we find
\begin{equation}
2 m \bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right) \gamma^{\mu} u_{s}(\mathbf{p})=\bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\left[\left(p^{\prime}+p\right)^{\mu}-2 i S^{\mu \nu}\left(p^{\prime}-p\right)_{\nu}\right] u_{s}(\mathbf{p}).
\end{equation}
Sandwiching instead between $\bar{v}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)$ and $v_s(\vb{p})$, referring again to (\ref{uv}) and (\ref{uv_bar}) gives
\begin{equation}
-2 m \bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right) \gamma^{\mu} v_{s}(\mathbf{p})=\bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\qty[\left(p^{\prime}+p\right)^{\mu}-2 i S^{\mu \nu}\left(p^{\prime}-p\right)_{\nu}] v_{s}(\mathbf{p}).
\end{equation}
These are known as \textit{Gordon Identities}. A special case is that of $p^\prime=p$:
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{\mu} u_{s}(\mathbf{p})&=2 p^{\mu} \delta_{s^{\prime} s} \\
\bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{\mu} v_{s}(\mathbf{p})&=2 p^{\mu} \delta_{s^{\prime} s}
\end{aligned}
\label{special_gordon_id}
\end{equation}
And we can also show \cite{srednicki2007quantum} that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\bar{u}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{0} v_{s}(-\mathbf{p})&=0 \\
\bar{v}_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{0} u_{s}(-\mathbf{p})&=0.
\end{aligned}
\label{special_gordon_id_negative}
\end{equation}
As for spin sums, we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\sum_{s=\pm} u_{s}(\mathbf{p}) \bar{u}_{s}(\mathbf{p})&=-\slashed{p}+m \\
\sum_{s=\pm} v_{s}(\mathbf{p}) \bar{v}_{s}(\mathbf{p})&=-\slashed{p}-m
\end{aligned}
\label{spin_sum}
\end{equation}
extrapolated from the rest frame case, where these reduce to $\sum_{s=\pm} u_{s}(\mathbf{0}) \bar{u}_{s}(\mathbf{0})=m \gamma^{0}+m$ and $\sum_{s=\pm} v_{s}(\mathbf{0}) \bar{v}_{s}(\mathbf{0})=m \gamma^{0}-m$, which we can verify from relations (\ref{uv_columm}) and (\ref{uv_row}).
\section{Creation and annihilation operators}
To express the creation/annihilation operators in terms of the Dirac field we note from (\ref{dirac_mode_expansion}) that
\begin{equation}
\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{-i p x} \Psi(x)=\sum_{s^{\prime}=\pm}\left[\frac{1}{2 \omega} b_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p}) u_{s^{\prime}}(\mathbf{p})+\frac{1}{2 \omega} e^{2 i \omega t} d_{s^{\prime}}^{\dagger}(-\mathbf{p}) v_{s^{\prime}}(-\mathbf{p})\right].
\end{equation}
We multiply on the left by $\bar{u}_s(\vb{p})\gamma^0$ and use the first relation from (\ref{special_gordon_id}) and the first relation from (\ref{special_gordon_id_negative}), getting
\begin{equation}
b_{s}(\mathbf{p})=\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{-i p x} \bar{u}_{s}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{0} \Psi(x).
\end{equation}
Hermitian conjugation gives $b^\dagger_s(\vb{p})$. Noting that $[\bar{u}_s(\vb{p})\gamma^0\Psi(x)]^\dagger=\Psi^\dagger\gamma^0\bar{u}_s^\dagger(\vb{p})=\bar{\Psi}\beta\gamma^0\beta u_s(\vb{p})=\bar{\Psi}(x)\gamma^0u_s(\vb{p})$ we find
\begin{equation}
b_{s}^\dagger(\mathbf{p})=\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{i p x} \bar{\Psi}(x)\gamma^0u_s(\mathbf{p})
\label{bdagger_psi}
\end{equation}
Similarly, calculating $\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{i p x} \Psi(x)$, multiplying in the left by $\bar{v}_s(\vb{p})\gamma^0$ using the second relation from (\ref{special_gordon_id}) and the second relation from (\ref{special_gordon_id_negative}) gives
\begin{equation}
d^\dagger_{s}(\mathbf{p})=\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{i p x} \bar{v}_{s}(\mathbf{p}) \gamma^{0} \Psi(x),
\end{equation}
and upon hermitian conjugation, we find
\begin{equation}
d_{s}(\mathbf{p})=\int \dd^{3} x\, e^{-i p x} \bar{\Psi}(x)\gamma^0v_s(\mathbf{p}).
\end{equation}
Now we turn to the anti-commutation relations the creation and annihilation operators must satisfy. It is clear from (\ref{anticomm_dirac}) that
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{l}
\left\{b_{s}(\mathbf{p}), b_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\right\}=0 \\
\left\{d_{s}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\right\}=0 \\
\{b_{s}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}^{\dagger}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}=0.
\end{array}
\end{equation}
Hermitian conjugation of these give
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\{b_{s}^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}), b_{s^{\prime}}^{\dagger}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=0 \\
\{d_{s}^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}^{\dagger}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=0 \\
\{b_{s}^{\dagger}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Now, making use of $(\gamma^0)^2=1$, relations (\ref{special_gordon_id}) and (\ref{special_gordon_id_negative}) and the canonical anti-commutation relations (\ref{anticomm_dirac}), we find
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\{b_{s}(\mathbf{p}), b^\dagger_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=(2\pi)^3\delta^3(\vb{p}-\vb{p}^\prime)2\omega\delta_{ss^\prime} \\
\{d^\dagger_{s}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=(2\pi)^3\delta^3(\vb{p}-\vb{p}^\prime)2\omega\delta_{ss^\prime}\\
\{b_{s}(\mathbf{p}), d_{s^{\prime}}\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}\right)\}&=0.
\end{aligned}
\label{coef_anticomm}
\end{equation}
These are the anti-commutation relations for fermion creation and annihilation operators. We have two types $b$-type fermions and $d$-type fermions and they will be distinguished by their charges and recognized as the electron and the positron, respectively, if $\Psi$ is used as the electron field.
\section{The Dirac field Hamiltonian}
Now we calculate the Hamiltonian density for the Dirac Field
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}=\pdv{\mathcal{L}}{(\partial_0\Psi)}\partial_0\Psi+\pdv{\mathcal{L}}{(\partial_0\bar{\Psi})}\partial_0\bar{\Psi}-\mathcal{L}=-i\bar{\Psi}\gamma^j\partial_j\Psi+m\bar{\Psi}\Psi.
\end{equation}
The total Hamiltonian is
\begin{equation}
H=\int\dd^3 x\, \Bar{\Psi}(-i\gamma^j\partial_j+m)\Psi
\end{equation}
Noting that
\begin{equation}
(-i\gamma^j\partial_j+m)\Psi=\sum_{\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\qty[b_s(\vb{p})(\gamma^jp_j+m)u_s(\vb{p})e^{ipx}+d^\dagger_{s}(\vb{p})(-\gamma^jp_j+m)v_s(\vb{p})e^{-ipx}],
\end{equation}
that $(\gamma^jp_j+m)=(\gamma^\mu p_\mu+m-\gamma^0p_0)$, and using (\ref{uv}) gives
\begin{equation}
(-i\gamma^j\partial_j+m)\Psi=\sum_{\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\qty[b_s(\vb{p})\gamma^0\omega u_s(\vb{p})e^{ipx}-d^\dagger_{s}(\vb{p})\gamma^0\omega v_s(\vb{p})e^{-ipx}].
\end{equation}
Therefore
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
H&=\sum_{s,s^\prime=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\,\widetilde{\dd p}^\prime\dd^3 x \qty(b^\dagger_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)e^{-ip^\prime x}+d_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)\bar{v}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p}^\prime)e^{ip^\prime x})\\&\qquad\qquad\times\omega\qty(b_s(\vb{p})\gamma^0 u_s(\vb{p})e^{ipx}-d^\dagger_{s}(\vb{p})\gamma^0 v_s(\vb{p})e^{-ipx})
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Working this out gives
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
H&=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{s,s^\prime=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\Big{[}b^\dagger_{s^\prime}(\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})\overbrace{\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p})\gamma^0 u_s(\vb{p})}^{2\omega}
-b^\dagger_{s^\prime}(-\vb{p})d^\dagger_s(\vb{p})\overbrace{\bar{u}_{s^\prime}(-\vb{p})\gamma^0 v_s(\vb{p})}^{0}e^{2i\omega t}\\
&\qquad+ d_{s^\prime}(-\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})\underbrace{\bar{v}_{s^\prime}(-\vb{p})\gamma^0u_s(\vb{p})}_{0}e^{-2i\omega t} -d_{s^\prime}(\vb{p})d^\dagger_s(\vb{p})\underbrace{\bar{v}_{s^\prime}(\vb{p})\gamma^0v_s(\vb{p})}_{2\omega}\Big{]}\\
&=\sum_s\int\widetilde{\dd p}\,\omega\Big{[}b_s^\dagger(\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})-d_s(\vb{p})d_s^\dagger(\vb{p})\Big{]}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where the over- and under-braces come from (\ref{special_gordon_id}) and (\ref{special_gordon_id_negative}). Using the second anti-commutation relation of (\ref{coef_anticomm}), we find
\begin{equation}
H=\sum_{s=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\,\omega\qty[b_s^\dagger(\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})+d_s^\dagger(\vb{p})d_s(\vb{p})]-4\mathcal{E}_0V
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{E}_0=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\int\dd^3 k\, \omega$ is the zero point energy and $V=(2\pi)^3\delta^3(\vb{0})$ is the volume of space. To make the ground state energy equal to zero we add $\Omega_0=-4\mathcal{E}_0$ to the Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$ so that the Hamiltonian is simply\begin{equation}
H=\sum_{s=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\,\omega\qty[b_s^\dagger(\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})+d_s^\dagger(\vb{p})d_s(\vb{p})].
\end{equation}
The Hamiltonian ground state vanishes upon the action of $b$- and $d$-type annihilation operators: $b_s(\vb{p})\ket{0}=d_s(\vb{p})\ket{0}=0$. While $b^\dagger_s(\vb{p})$ creates an electron with $S_z$ eigenvalue $\frac{1}{2}s$ and $d^\dagger_s(\vb{p})$ creates a positron with $S_z$ eigenvalue $\frac{1}{2}s$. Similarly to the Hamiltonian, we can express the Noether charge in terms of the $b$ and $d$ operators, up to a constant term:
\begin{equation}
Q=\int\dd^3 x\, \bar{\Psi}\gamma^0\Psi=\sum_{s=\pm}\int\widetilde{\dd p}\qty[b_s^\dagger(\vb{p})b_s(\vb{p})-d_s^\dagger(\vb{p})d_s(\vb{p})]
\end{equation}