Skip to content

Widget annotation kid of radio button field seems to be treated as field dictionary rather than annotation dictionary #13

@a20dev

Description

@a20dev

For the attached file, I get these unexpected errors from verapdf-arlington 1.29.78:

  • FieldBtnRadio shall not contain entries except AA, DA, DV, FT, Ff, Kids, Opt, Parent, Q, T, TM, TU, V ( FieldBtnRadio contains entry(ies) F)
  • Entry Ff with type Bitmask in Field shall satisfy special case: fn:Eval(fn:BitsClear(4, 32))
  • Entry DA in FieldBtnRadio is required (Entry DA in FieldBtnRadio is missing)
  • Field shall not contain entries except AA, Ff, Kids, Parent, T, TM, TU (Field contains entry(ies) F,V,FT)

Apparently, the entries of the Kids array of the field dictionary are interpreted as field dictionaries rather than annotation dictionaries. However, 12.7.5.2.4 of ISO 32000-2:2020 says:

The Kids entry in the radio button field’s field dictionary [...] holds an array of widget annotations representing the individual buttons in the set.

r3.pdf

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

questionFurther information is requested

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions