An open source Or a siginificant Vendor Lock-in? #679
cloudcompute
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I understand promoting your own products, and to some extent that makes sense.
However, heavily promoting third-party services like Arcjet, Basehub, Logtail, Clerk, Svix, Liveblocks, Knocklabs, and Upstash introduces a significant vendor lock-in. For many teams - especially those evaluating a SaaS starter or open-source kit - this becomes a real concern rather than a convenience.
Additionally, I’ve noticed that TanStack’s open-source libraries aren’t used anywhere in your open-source products or even in example implementations. In practice, many SaaS applications rely heavily on TanStack tooling, and it’s hard to consider a SaaS kit complete without something like
@tanstack/react-table.Including widely adopted, framework-agnostic open-source tools would make these examples more realistic and broadly useful, while reducing unnecessary coupling to specific vendors.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions