refer to grpc::Channel by forward decl #342
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lia-viam
requested review from
njooma and
stuqdog
and removed request for
a team
Collaborator
Author
|
Sigh turns out this also falls under the weird grpc_impl forward decl stuff, going to add it to that one |
Member
|
This looks like it shares a lot with #341, is that correct? Should they both be reviewed? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was an easy self-contained API insulation ticket that I was able to branch of main rather than the in flight PRs
Includes some drive-by changes; also took the grpc::Channel typedef out of our namespace