[Feature]: Pokemon series is a bit messy

[Die4Ever]

Summary

The original site looked like this

Split by sub-series instead of by game.

Maybe we could divide series by sub-series, and then also have randomizers with more than 5 supported games listed outside of the games and have their games listed inside the randomizer itself (like the recent updates section does). Or maybe we could do more sub-series for Pokemon, like Core GB, Core GBA, Core DS... And have the randomizers listed in each of the sub-series they apply to.

Maybe each series could have a field to specify how it is formatted? Like multi-series already has its own format but that's hardcoded, it could be a flag in the yml file.

[Die4Ever]

what do we think of this style of grouping, separating out multi-game randomizers?

[Die4Ever]

it can look a little silly when there's only 1 non-multi-game randomizer

and then if we also want to do grouping by sub-series, it could become a bit complicated, or maybe users will get confused with the variations of formatting (grouped by game, grouped by sub-series, grouped by game and sub-series, multi-games together, ungrouped)

This also means if a game is only represented by multi-game randomizers, then the tags for the game are not displayed (release year, platforms, genres, sub-series)

[SmashManiac]

This hybrid approach is fine in my opinion as it cleans up some duplicate data a bit compared to now, but I agree with the flagged issues so far, and it would effectively revert to grouping by rando as I was originally doing instead of by game, with all that entails.

One thing I would consider instead is to use the <details> and <summary> HTML elements to collapse the information per game by default. For Pokémon specifically, we could also potentially classify each Gen if things would get out of control otherwise.