-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Closed
Labels
Description
Describe the bug
Hi,
I use Vitest in my monorepo, and for one of my apps (apps/server) I needed to set
sequence: {
concurrent: false,
},
maxWorkers: 1,Now when I run vitest run in the root of my repo I get this error:
$ pnpm run test
> sunverv2@1.91.0 test /home/me/Desktop/Work/Company/company-monorepo
> vitest run
RUN v4.0.4 /home/me/Desktop/Work/Company/company-monorepo
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Errors ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Vitest caught 1 unhandled error during the test run.
This might cause false positive tests. Resolve unhandled errors to make sure your tests are not affected.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Error ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Error: Projects "server" and "@sunver/prisma" have different 'maxWorkers' but same 'sequence.groupId'.
Provide unique 'sequence.groupId' for them.
Ok, but sequence.groupId doesn't seems to exist in the SequenceOptions type.
Am I missing something or is it a bug ?
Thank you,
Yohann
Reproduction
I created a basic repo with full reproduction: https://github.com/Yohannfra/turborepo-example-bug-vitest
System Info
System:
OS: Linux 6.14 Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS 24.04.3 LTS (Noble Numbat)
CPU: (22) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 185H
Memory: 21.74 GB / 30.79 GB
Container: Yes
Shell: 5.9 - /usr/bin/zsh
Binaries:
Node: 22.21.0 - /home/yohann/.nvm/versions/node/v22.21.0/bin/node
npm: 10.9.4 - /home/yohann/.nvm/versions/node/v22.21.0/bin/npm
pnpm: 10.18.3 - /home/yohann/.nvm/versions/node/v22.21.0/bin/pnpm
Deno: 2.4.5 - /home/yohann/.deno/bin/deno
Browsers:
Chrome: 141.0.7390.107
Chromium: 141.0.7390.122
Firefox: 144.0
Firefox Developer Edition: 144.0
npmPackages:
@vitest/coverage-v8: 4.0.4 => 4.0.4
@vitest/ui: 4.0.4 => 4.0.4
vitest: 4.0.4 => 4.0.4Used Package Manager
pnpm
Validations
- Follow our Code of Conduct
- Read the Contributing Guidelines.
- Read the docs.
- Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.
- Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A open a GitHub Discussion or join our Discord Chat Server.
- The provided reproduction is a minimal reproducible example of the bug.
Reactions are currently unavailable