Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
|
sounds about right. but note that its a difficult topic.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@vladmandic do you have any plans to support dlib_face_recognition_resnet_model_v1 in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
resnet models are generally much larger and not really suitable for web usage, so its not primary target for human. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am compairing face-recognition.js (is using dlib_face_recognition_resnet_model_v1) and
human. I have a set of 130 faces (different people) and another one that belongs to the person in this set and is used as a searchinput. Let's name the person we are looking for in the setx. I want to havexas the closest match to theinput. Bothface-recognition.jsandhumansuccessfully found the searched person as the closest, but I've noticed one thing. The distance to the next person from the match is smaller in thehumansearch result compared to theface-recognition.jssearch result. Does this mean thatface-recognition.jswas more confident in distinguishing faces andhumanwill produce more false positives as the database grows significantly?humanxface-recognition.jsx(sorted by smallest distance)
To compare the search results from both libraries I had to multiply every
face-recognition.jsdistance by 27.3558887. Am I doing something wrong? Am I jumping to the wrong conclusions?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions