-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
My project spans several repositories under a single GitHub user. I'm building a vitepress project (which is in its own repository) for documentation and API reference for all my repositories because they are all related to each other. I like to include Markdown and code snippets from each of the repositories.
I've tried this for including files from my vitepress repository, like this
<!--@include: ./setup.md-->and it works nicely, but
<!--@include: https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/README.md#reporting-issues -->does not work.
It would be very helpful to be able to include arbitrary markdown and code into my vitepress project. Is there a way to do this?
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be very helpful to be able to include arbitrary markdown and code into my vitepress project.
Sections from a Markdown file:
<!--@include: https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/README.md#reporting-issues -->Lines from a JSON (or any source code) file:
<!--@include: https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/1999/0xxx/CVE-1999-0001.json{123,131} -->Is there a way to do this?
Describe alternatives you've considered
One possible alternative to doing it in vitepress' markdown extension is to write a Vue component that reads in the file and displays that, but having it as a feature of vitepress so others can use it would be more useful to the vitepress community.
Additional context
I think this feature would be useful for writing Guides and API References, but also other documentation (e.g., a full tutorial for using Vue and vitepress in a Docker container, in a section for how to set up the development environment) where it would be even more important so that the doc is always up-to-date with its dependent projects.
Validations
- Follow our Code of Conduct
- Read the docs.
- Read the Contributing Guidelines.
- Check that there isn't already an issue that asks for the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.