Skip to content

Notes on additional testing for ECDSA-SD #38

@aljones15

Description

@aljones15

Author @Wind4Greg

After an initial round of testing with the suites I put down some notes on some of the subtleties of testing ECDSA-SD. Take a look and let me know if you have any questions.

Notes on additional testing for ECDSA-SD
Unlike ecdsa-rdfc-2019 and ecdsa-jcs-2019, ecdsa-sd-2023 has three (or four) rather than two fundamental functions to be tested. These are roughly

Add Base: inputs: unsigned document, mandatory pointers. returns a signed base document. Can use the VC-API: issue credential API but need to supplement the options object to support mandatoryPointers or have it as a separate item.

Verify Base: technically not required in the specification, but needed to know if someones base proof meets the spec. inputs: signed base document. In my ECDSA-SD library I provide a high level function for this. Could use the VC-API: verify credential API to check this.

Derive Proof: inputs: signed base document, selective pointers; Returns signed derived document. Can use the VC-API derive credential API, however the frame field is out of date and should be replace by a selectivePointers field of type array.

Verify Derived: input: signed derived document, Returns true or false; Should use the VC-API: verify credential API to check this.

Proof Value Checking
For both base proof and derived proof the encoding is base64url-no-pad-encoding and not base-58-btc and starts with a u and not a z. In addition the decoded proofs should start with the following bytes:

base proof header bytes 0xd9, 0x5d, and 0x00
disclosure proof header bytes 0xd9, 0x5d, and 0x01

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions