Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
ah yes We want our UIs to evolve - but change is disruptive (even debilitating) for elders. But we can't still be supporting the interface for DOS Windows 3.2 XP etc. and delaying the day when they have to deal with a changed UI only makes it more likely that the UI change to that version will be even more drastic. Do you have a suggested solution to it? The only one i know of is the Info-Bot/IUIG approach |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think in real-world use, UI updates can also pose significant challenges for users, especially those with disabilities or older adults. Changes in the interface cause confusion and increase the cognitive burden, making it harder for users to navigate and interact with services. I suggest that guidelines also address the frequency and manner of UI updates. Even when updates are necessary, they should be designed to remain predictable and familiar so that users can anticipate changes and adapt without undue difficulty.
I know it is somewhat different from the existing guidelines, but I believe that many considerations are also needed from the perspective of maintenance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions