Our social media sharing image metadata seems to not be set up properly.

Example post: OLED and dark websites = lower footprint ✨. The source image is 1600x900.

• The Twitter image is 400px. I’m not clear why we would be using a different social image just for that network. If we keep the meta tag, we probably should use the same image rendition as og:image.
• The OpenGraph image is 1114 x 627, as it’s rendered with width-1200 height-627. This is below the LinkedIn recommended minimum of 1200x627

I believe the problem here is there shouldn’t be two width- and height- tags in use. Images with an aspect ratio squarer than the recommended 1.91:1 will be resized below the minimum size.

• width-1200 takes the 1600x900 image to 1200x675
• height-627 takes the 1200x675 to 1114x627

Instead we probably want the min or fill filters.