Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
it would be better it's released in 0.4.0 incase different behavior caused by new Implementation and old Implementation inconsistencies, people may rely on some css bug caused by old behavior |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
After implementing the new
SplitChunksPluginand the tests being passed, Rspack enable the newSplitChunksPluginby default. It brings better performance and stability.And there's one issue remains unresolved, which is #3120.But now #3120 is solved, which leave us no reasons to keep the old
SplitChunksPluginanymore.So I think it's time to remove the old
SplitChunksPluginfrom the codebase, it will reduce the binary size of rspack and complexity of the codebase.I don't consider this a breaking change, since the new
SplitChunksPluginis enable by default and we are removing a option inexperiments.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions