Skip to content

s option for sequence overlapping threshold picking up wrong cut-off values #143

@yuqiwangcbcb

Description

@yuqiwangcbcb

I have uploaded the sample sequences in link: https://hershey.dbi.udel.edu/wangy/CD-HIT/

Basically with -s 0.8 it does not pick up the members when we cluster with CD-HIT-2D.
OPTIONS="-s 0.8 -c 0.5 -n 3 -i seed_UP000267492.fa -i2 proteome_UP001178061.fa -o test.cd_hit"
${CDHIT2D} ${OPTIONS} > cd_hit.log

This gives us a cluster result as below despite the members are all over 50% ID and 80% long than the seed.

Cluster 0
0 1941aa, >UPI00071F4AE4|1941... *
Cluster 1
0 395aa, >UPI002377C42E|395... *
Cluster 2
0 294aa, >UPI0007200FDE|294... *

Correct clustering result when we use -s 0.5 is:

Cluster 0
0 1941aa, >UPI00071F4AE4|1941... *
1 1939aa, >UNG44331|1939... at 82.77%
Cluster 1
0 395aa, >UPI002377C42E|395... *
1 388aa, >UNG44330|388... at 50.26%
Cluster 2
0 294aa, >UPI0007200FDE|294... *
1 259aa, >UNG44329|259... at 66.41%

With further investigation, we have found that there is a threshold between
-s 0.629251700680272196
-s 0.629251700680272197
When you cross that point all of a sudden all three clusters lose their members. And this clearly is not intended with the option -s. The three clusters in our example obviously have different cut thresholds.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions