Add performance benchmarks to compare django-new-forms vs standard Django forms

[Peopl3s]

Аfter the implementation of the basic functionality, the project lacks performance metrics to demonstrate the benefits of using external validation backends (pydantic, msgspec) over standard Django forms validation. To justify the adoption of django-new-forms and help users make informed decisions, we need comprehensive benchmarks that quantify the performance differences.

Users and potential adopters need concrete data to understand:

• How much faster/slower are pydantic/msgspec backends compared to Django's built-in validation?
• What are the trade-offs in terms of memory usage?
• How performance scales with different form complexities?
• Which backend performs best for specific use cases?

Without this data, it's difficult to:

• Convince teams to adopt the library
• Make informed decisions about backend selection
• Identify performance bottlenecks
• Optimize the library for production use

[kondratevdev]

Sounds good, thank you!

[kondratevdev]

@Peopl3s It would be great if you wanted to do it :)

[ofek]

Hello there! I recently became a co-maintainer of msgspec and am looking through open issues referencing the project name. I'd be very interested in seeing the results of your benchmarks. Let me know if I can help 🙂

[kondratevdev]

Hello there! I recently became a co-maintainer of msgspec and am looking through open issues referencing the project name. I'd be very interested in seeing the results of your benchmarks. Let me know if I can help 🙂

Sure! Thank you!