[Bug] 试用gemini翻译时会输出思考过程

[JANETXSM]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Have you checked the FAQ (#6)?

• I have checked the FAQ

Are you using the latest Zotero and the latest plugin?

• I have confirmed I'm using the latest Zotero and the latest plugin

Environment

• OS:
• Zotero Version:
• Plugin Version:

Describe the bug

已选中“从翻译结果中删除多余空行和思考内容”

Debug Output

/

Anything else?

No response

[baalchina]

同样的问题（使用qwen3.5），提示结果如下：

同样勾选了从翻译结果中删除多余空行和思考内容，并且自定义提示词也写了

5.直接给出结果，不需要输出思考过程的内容

[Chapoly1305]

两位用了中转站了吗？

[JANETXSM]

两位用了中转站了吗？

是的，不过用同一个中转里其他模型就没问题（有这个问题的是gemini-2.5-pro，换成2.5-flash就没问题了）

[baalchina]

两位用了中转站了吗？

没，用的自己的gpustack，部署在服务器上的本地算力和本地模型

[Chapoly1305]

从图片来看，看着像是模型在假装思考的样子。得发一下日志看看原始回复是什么。

[baalchina]

从图片来看，看着像是模型在假装思考的样子。得发一下日志看看原始回复是什么。

不知道是不是qwen3.5的问题。。。

如下是英文原文
Figure 4 illustrates two aspects of MLA – the MHA and MQA modes – as well as the transformation between them.

如下是输出
Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** * **Role:** Academic expert with expertise in various fields. * **Task:** Translate the provided English academic text (en-US) to Chinese (zh-CN). * **Requirements:** * Skilled and accurate translation. * Maintain original phrases or sentences where appropriate. * Ensure accuracy. * No explanation after the translation. * Delete any extra content (like thinking process). * Output only the translated result. * **Source Text:** "Figure 4 illustrates two aspects of MLA – the MHA and MQA modes – as well as the transformation between them." * **Constraint:** Direct result, no thinking process output. 2. **Analyze the Source Text:** * "Figure 4 illustrates": 图 4 展示了/说明了 * "two aspects of MLA": MLA 的两个方面 * "– the MHA and MQA modes –": – MHA 和 MQA 模式 – (MHA = Multi-Head Attention, MQA = Multi-Query Attention, MLA likely refers to Mixture of Long Attention or similar, but in this context, it's likely a specific architecture term. Given the context of MHA/MQA, MLA often stands for Multi-head Latent Attention or similar in transformer contexts, but keeping the acronym is safer for academic translation unless standard Chinese terms exist. Usually, acronyms like MHA/MQA/MLA are kept as is or transliterated if well-known. In NLP/Deep Learning context, MHA (Multi-Head Attention) is often "多头注意力", MQA (Multi-Query Attention) is "多查询注意力". However, the prompt asks to maintain original phrases/sentences where appropriate and ensure accuracy. In academic translation, keeping acronyms is common. Let's look at "MLA". It could be "Multi-Length Attention" or similar. Since I don't have the full paper, keeping the acronyms is safest for accuracy.) * "as well as the transformation between them": 以及它们之间的转换/变换。 3. **Drafting the Translation:** * *Option 1 (Literal):* 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 * *Option 2 (More Academic):* 图 4 说明了 MLA 的两个方面，即 MHA 和 MQA 模式，以及它们之间的转换。 * *Option 3 (Maintaining structure):* 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 *Refining based on "maintain original phrases or sentences":* The dashes "– –" are em-dashes used for parenthetical explanation. In Chinese, we can use "——" or keep the meaning. "MHA and MQA modes" -> "MHA 和 MQA 模式" "transformation between them" -> "它们之间的转换" Let's combine: 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 *Check accuracy:* "illustrates" -> 展示 / 说明。"展示" is fine. "aspects" -> 方面。 "modes" -> 模式. "transformation" -> 转换 / 变换。In architecture context, "转换" or "转换机制" is okay. Let's stick to "转换". *Final Polish:* 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 *Wait, checking constraint 3:* "保持原来的短语或句子并确保准确性是至关重要的" (Maintaining original phrases or sentences and ensuring accuracy is crucial). This might mean keeping English acronyms (MHA, MQA, MLA) as is, which I did. *Wait, checking constraint 4 & 5:* "请提供翻译后的结果，不作任何解释，删除" (Provide translated result, no explanation, delete [extra stuff]), "直接给出结果，不需要输出思考过程的内容" (Give result directly, no thinking process). *Decision:* 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 *Alternative for "transformation":* Sometimes "transformation" in this context might refer to the switching or mechanism. "转换" is standard. *Alternative for "illustrates":* "阐明" (clarify) or "展示" (illustrate/show). "展示" is closer to "illustrates" in figure captions. Let's finalize: 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 4. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure no markdown blocks like ``` unless necessary, but usually plain text is preferred for direct translation requests unless specified. The prompt says "Directly give the result".) I will output just the text. Wait, re-reading constraint 3: "保持原来的短语或句子". This likely refers to technical terms/acronyms. Re-reading constraint 4: "不作任何解释，删除". Re-reading constraint 5: "不需要输出思考过程". Okay, ready to output. One more check: "MLA" context. In recent LLM literature (like vLLM or similar), MLA often refers to "Multi-Token Prediction" or "Multi-Head Latent Attention"? Actually, in the context of MHA (Multi-Head Attention) and MQA (Multi-Query Attention), MLA often refers to "Multi-Layer Attention" or something specific to the paper this text comes from. Without context, keeping "MLA" is correct. Translation: 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 Or slightly more formal: 图 4 说明了 MLA 的两个方面，即 MHA 和 MQA 模式，以及它们之间的转换。 But keeping the dashes is better for structure fidelity. Let's use: 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 Wait, "modes" -> 模式. "transformation" -> 转换. Okay. One detail: "delete" in constraint 4 might mean "delete the instruction text". I should only output the translation. Final check on constraints: 1. Skilled/Accurate. 2. Maintain phrases (acronyms). 3. Source text provided. 4. No explanation. 5. No thinking process. Output: 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。 </think> 图 4 展示了 MLA 的两个方面——MHA 和 MQA 模式——以及它们之间的转换。

[Chapoly1305]

我确实看到了有一个 </think> 的tag，但是没有开始的 <think>。 这样，你试一下把“从翻译结果中删除多余空行和思考内容”关掉，然后再翻译一段。我看看返回文本最开始是什么。

[baalchina]

我确实看到了有一个 </think> 的tag，但是没有开始的 <think>。 这样，你试一下把“从翻译结果中删除多余空行和思考内容”关掉，然后再翻译一段。我看看返回文本最开始是什么。

格式好像整齐一点。。。原文是这个：
Future Validation in Real World.
返回是这个：
`
Thinking Process:

1. Analyze the Request:

   • Role: Academic expert with knowledge in various fields.
   • Task: Translate the provided academic text from English (en-US) to Chinese (zh-CN).
   • Requirements:
     • Proficient and accurate translation.
     • Use appropriate language (academic tone).
     • Maintain original phrases or sentences where appropriate.
     • Ensure accuracy.
     • Output only the translated result, no explanations, no thinking process.
   • Source Text: "Future Validation in Real World."

2. Analyze the Source Text:

   • "Future Validation": Indicates validation that will happen in the future, or validation regarding future scenarios/needs. In an academic context, it often refers to "Prospective Validation" or validation planned for later stages.
   • "in Real World": Refers to "Real-World" settings (as opposed to controlled lab environments). Often translated as "真实世界".
   • Context: Likely a section heading or a concluding remark about future work.

3. Determine the Translation:

   • Literal: 未来真实世界的验证.
   • Academic Standard:
     • "Real World" in medical/tech research is commonly translated as "真实世界".
     • "Validation" is "验证".
     • "Future Validation" could be "未来验证" or "后续验证" (depending on context, but "未来" is more literal).
     • Combined: "真实世界中的未来验证" or "面向未来的真实世界验证".
     • However, looking at typical academic headings: "Future Validation in Real World" often implies validation studies to be conducted in real-world settings later.
     • Common phrasing in Chinese academic papers: "真实世界的未来验证" or "未来真实世界验证".
     • Let's aim for natural academic Chinese while keeping the structure clear.
     • Option 1: 真实世界的未来验证 (Future Validation in Real World)
     • Option 2: 未来真实世界验证 (Future Real-World Validation) - This flows better.
     • Option 3: 现实世界的未来验证 (Less common, "真实世界" is the standard term for "Real World" in this context).
     • Option 4: 未来在真实世界中的验证 (Too wordy).
     • Best fit for a section title: "真实世界的未来验证" or "未来真实世界验证". Given the instruction to maintain original phrases/sentences where appropriate, "未来验证" and "真实世界" are key terms.
     • Let's refine: "真实世界中的未来验证" is accurate. But headings often drop "中的".
     • "未来真实世界验证" captures "Future Validation" + "Real World".
     • Alternatively, "未来：真实世界验证" (No, changes structure).
     • Let's go with a balanced academic tone: "真实世界中的未来验证" or simply "未来真实世界验证".
     • Considering the instruction "保持原来的短语或句子" (maintain original phrases or sentences), I should ensure the meaning is preserved closely.
     • "Future Validation" -> "未来验证"
     • "Real World" -> "真实世界"
     • Translation: "真实世界中的未来验证" (Future Validation in Real World).
     • Or more idiomatic for a title: "未来真实世界验证".
     • Let's choose the most professional academic phrasing. In medical/tech fields, "Real-World Validation" is "真实世界验证". So "Future Validation in Real World" -> "未来真实世界验证".
     • Wait, "Future Validation" might mean validation that is yet to be done.
     • Let's check standard translations. "Real-World Validation" is often "真实世界验证". Adding "Future": "未来真实世界验证".
     • Another option: "真实世界的未来验证".
     • Let's pick "真实世界中的未来验证" for precision, or "未来真实世界验证" for conciseness as a heading. Given it's likely a heading
       `

[Chapoly1305]

@baalchina 从这个Response来看，好像模型没有给你返回Think Tag，所以没法把这个剥离开。我用Ollama试了一下QWen的模型，在我这里表现是正常的。我怀疑可能是你用的平台的问题，暂时没什么好的建议，只能是试试看别的模型有没有这个问题了。