Various docs improvements

[anaxite]

Hi! Following some discussion in Discord, I'm taking note of some things I felt could be improved in the docs.

start page

1. https://docs.studiocms.dev/en/start-here/getting-started/#configure-studiocms-rendering-
   This section does not explain or link to the config file docs, so a starting user can get confused as to what to do

2. https://docs.studiocms.dev/en/start-here/getting-started/#creating-a-studiocms-project
   Does not highlight lines correctly? In my case, the install also added adapter: node({ mode: "standalone" }),

3. https://docs.studiocms.dev/en/start-here/getting-started/#creating-a-studiocms-project
   Does not mention the PNPM command from https://docs.studiocms.dev/en/package-catalog/studiocms-plugins/studiocms-mdx/, so I was confused

PNPM commands

A lot of PNPM commands needs to be updated.

• pnpm run studiocms only works if package.json has a studiocms command.
• In most cases, pnpm exec studiocms should be the correct command for invoking Studio CMS, such as when adding adapters

Other?

I'll note more things as I notice them. I'll see if I can make the changes.

[Adammatthiesen]

To be clear in regards to the <pkgMnger> run studiocms command...

In our actual templates that are installed using the create studiocms command, as seen here do actually include the studiocms command to their package.json just like how Astro does.

Out of curiosity which of the 3 setup processes did you go through? StudioCMS CLI, Astro Method, or Manual?

[Adammatthiesen]

Hey @anaxite there has been some improvements on our docs with the latest release. Please let us know if this helps solve some of the issues. Also would love some more information related to my previous questions.