You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
2. Accumulation of tar in the lungs increase the risk of cancer
205
221
3. Smoking itself also increases the risk of cancer
206
222
207
-
{#cancer
209
-
height="100pt"}
223
+
{#cancer height="100pt"}
210
224
211
225
The ID algorithm [@shpitser2006id] estimates the effect of smoking on the risk
212
226
of cancer in \autoref{cancer}A as
@@ -240,27 +254,33 @@ We highlight several which used (and motivated further development of) $Y_0$:
240
254
workflow for simple causal queries compatible with `ID`.
241
255
-[@ness_causal_2024] uses $Y_0$ as a teaching tool for identification and the
242
256
causal hierarchy
243
-
- TODO Jeremy reference other PNNL use cases (even if they're not published)
244
257
245
258
# Future direction
246
259
247
260
There remain several high value identification algorithms to include in $Y_0$ in
248
-
the future. For example, the generalized ID (`gID`) [@lee2019general] and
249
-
generalized counterfactual ID (`gID*`) [@correa2021counterfactual] are important
250
-
because TODO Jeremy. The cyclic ID (`ioID`)
261
+
the future. For example, the cyclic ID (`ioID`)
251
262
[@forré2019causalcalculuspresencecycles] is important to work with more
252
263
realistic graphs that contain cycles, such as how biomolecular signaling
253
-
pathways often contain feedback loops.
254
-
255
-
Similarly, it remains an open research question on how to estimate the causal
256
-
effect for an arbitrary estimand produced by an algorithm more sophisticated
257
-
than `ID`. Two potential avenues for overcoming this might be a combination of
258
-
the Pyro probabilistic programming langauge [@bingham2018pyro] and its causal
0 commit comments