|
| 1 | +from negmas.gb.negotiators.timebased import AspirationNegotiator |
| 2 | +from negmas.outcomes.base_issue import make_issue |
| 3 | +from negmas.outcomes.outcome_space import make_os |
| 4 | +from negmas.preferences.base_ufun import BaseUtilityFunction |
| 5 | +from negmas.preferences.crisp.linear import LinearAdditiveUtilityFunction |
| 6 | +from negmas.preferences.ops import compare_ufuns |
| 7 | +from negmas.preferences.value_fun import AffineFun, LinearFun |
| 8 | +from negmas.sao.mechanism import SAOMechanism |
| 9 | +from negmas.sao.negotiators.modular import BOANegotiator |
| 10 | +from negmas.sao.components.offering import TimeBasedOfferingPolicy |
| 11 | +from negmas.sao.components.acceptance import ACNext |
| 12 | +from negmas.gb.components.genius.models import GSmithFrequencyModel |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +def test_gsmith_frequency_model_initializes_base_ufun_attributes(): |
| 16 | + """Test that GSmithFrequencyModel properly initializes BaseUtilityFunction attributes. |
| 17 | +
|
| 18 | + This ensures that the attrs-based GeniusOpponentModel correctly calls |
| 19 | + BaseUtilityFunction.__init__ via __attrs_post_init__. |
| 20 | + """ |
| 21 | + model = GSmithFrequencyModel() |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + # Verify all attributes set by BaseUtilityFunction.__init__ are present and have correct defaults |
| 24 | + assert hasattr(model, "_reserved_value"), "Missing _reserved_value attribute" |
| 25 | + assert hasattr(model, "_invalid_value"), "Missing _invalid_value attribute" |
| 26 | + assert hasattr(model, "_cached_inverse"), "Missing _cached_inverse attribute" |
| 27 | + assert hasattr(model, "_cached_inverse_type"), ( |
| 28 | + "Missing _cached_inverse_type attribute" |
| 29 | + ) |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + # Check default values match BaseUtilityFunction defaults |
| 32 | + assert model._reserved_value == float("-inf"), ( |
| 33 | + f"Expected -inf, got {model._reserved_value}" |
| 34 | + ) |
| 35 | + assert model._invalid_value is None, f"Expected None, got {model._invalid_value}" |
| 36 | + assert model._cached_inverse is None, f"Expected None, got {model._cached_inverse}" |
| 37 | + assert model._cached_inverse_type is None, ( |
| 38 | + f"Expected None, got {model._cached_inverse_type}" |
| 39 | + ) |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + # Verify the model is an instance of BaseUtilityFunction |
| 42 | + assert isinstance(model, BaseUtilityFunction) |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + # Verify the reserved_value property works (uses _reserved_value internally) |
| 45 | + assert model.reserved_value == float("-inf") |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +def calc_scores(m: SAOMechanism) -> dict[str, dict[str, float]]: |
| 49 | + """Compute scores for the given agreement according the ANL 2026 rules.""" |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + # extract the agreement |
| 52 | + agreement = m.agreement |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + # extract negotiator names |
| 55 | + negotiators = [_.__class__.__name__ for _ in m.negotiators] |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + # find advantages (utility above reserved value) |
| 58 | + advantages = [ |
| 59 | + float(_.ufun(agreement)) - float(_.ufun.reserved_value) if _.ufun else 0.0 |
| 60 | + for _ in m.negotiators |
| 61 | + ] |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + # calculate modeling accuracies |
| 64 | + ufuns = [_.ufun for _ in m.negotiators] |
| 65 | + models = [_.opponent_ufun for _ in m.negotiators] |
| 66 | + models.reverse() |
| 67 | + accuracies = [ |
| 68 | + (1 + compare_ufuns(u, model, method="kendall", outcome_space=m.outcome_space)) |
| 69 | + / 2 |
| 70 | + for u, model in zip(ufuns, models) |
| 71 | + ] |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | + # normalize accuracies so that we divide one point among all negotiators with |
| 74 | + # negotiators with higher accuracy getting higher part of this point. |
| 75 | + accsum = sum(accuracies) |
| 76 | + if accsum > 0: |
| 77 | + accuracies = [_ / accsum for _ in accuracies] |
| 78 | + else: |
| 79 | + accuracies = [0] * len(negotiators) |
| 80 | + accuracies.reverse() |
| 81 | + # return final scores. You can improve your score in one of three ways: |
| 82 | + # 1. Increase your advantage (negotiating a better deal for yourself) |
| 83 | + # 2. Increase your modeling accuracy (better opponent modeling) |
| 84 | + # 3. Decrease your opponent's accuracy (confuse their opponent modeling) |
| 85 | + return dict( |
| 86 | + zip( |
| 87 | + negotiators, |
| 88 | + ( |
| 89 | + dict(Advavntage=adv, Accuracy=acc, Score=adv + acc) |
| 90 | + for adv, acc in zip(advantages, accuracies) |
| 91 | + ), |
| 92 | + ) |
| 93 | + ) |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +class BOANeg(BOANegotiator): |
| 97 | + def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): |
| 98 | + offering = TimeBasedOfferingPolicy() |
| 99 | + kwargs |= dict( |
| 100 | + acceptance=ACNext(offering), offering=offering, model=GSmithFrequencyModel() |
| 101 | + ) |
| 102 | + super().__init__(*args, **kwargs) |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +def test_smith_frequency_model(): |
| 106 | + os = make_os([make_issue(10, "i1"), make_issue(10, "i2")]) |
| 107 | + m = SAOMechanism( |
| 108 | + n_steps=100, |
| 109 | + outcome_space=os, |
| 110 | + ignore_negotiator_exceptions=False, |
| 111 | + one_offer_per_step=True, |
| 112 | + ) |
| 113 | + m.add( |
| 114 | + BOANeg( |
| 115 | + ufun=LinearAdditiveUtilityFunction( |
| 116 | + values=[LinearFun(slope=0.1), LinearFun(slope=0.1)], |
| 117 | + weights=[0.5, 0.5], |
| 118 | + outcome_space=os, |
| 119 | + ), |
| 120 | + id="boa", |
| 121 | + ) |
| 122 | + ) |
| 123 | + m.add( |
| 124 | + AspirationNegotiator( |
| 125 | + ufun=LinearAdditiveUtilityFunction( |
| 126 | + values=[AffineFun(slope=-0.1, bias=10), LinearFun(slope=0.1)], |
| 127 | + weights=[0.8, 0.2], |
| 128 | + outcome_space=os, |
| 129 | + ), |
| 130 | + id="asp", |
| 131 | + ) |
| 132 | + ) |
| 133 | + m.run() |
| 134 | + print(calc_scores(m)) |
| 135 | + trace = m.extended_trace |
| 136 | + assert len(trace) > 2, f"{trace}" |
0 commit comments