|
| 1 | +# Decision Log: Pagination Implementation |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## [2025-04-27 13:47:10] - Pure Chunk-Based Virtualization Approach |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +**Decision**: The pagination system implements purely chunk-based virtualization without any row-based virtualization. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +**Context**: In web UI development, there are common approaches to efficiently rendering large datasets: |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +- Chunk-based virtualization (implemented in this project): Only rendering chunks of rows that are visible |
| 10 | +- Row-based virtualization (alternative approach, not implemented): Selectively rendering individual rows based on visibility |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +**Analysis of Current Implementation**: |
| 13 | +The implementation uses exclusively chunk-based virtualization: |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +- In `useScrollBasedChunks.ts`, the calculations only determine which chunks are visible: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + ```typescript |
| 18 | + // Lines 49-53 |
| 19 | + const start = Math.max(Math.floor(visibleStart / rowHeight / chunkSize) - overscanCount, 0); |
| 20 | + const end = Math.min( |
| 21 | + Math.floor(visibleEnd / rowHeight / chunkSize) + overscanCount, |
| 22 | + Math.max(chunksCount - 1, 0), |
| 23 | + ); |
| 24 | + ``` |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- In `TableChunk.tsx`, when a chunk is active, it renders ALL rows in that chunk: |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + ```typescript |
| 29 | + // Lines 136-144 |
| 30 | + return currentData.data.map((rowData, index) => ( |
| 31 | + <TableRow |
| 32 | + key={index} |
| 33 | + row={rowData as T} |
| 34 | + columns={columns} |
| 35 | + height={rowHeight} |
| 36 | + getRowClassName={getRowClassName} |
| 37 | + /> |
| 38 | + )); |
| 39 | + ``` |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +- There is no code that selectively renders individual rows based on their visibility |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +**Rationale**: |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- Simpler implementation and maintenance |
| 46 | +- More efficient data fetching by requesting groups of rows at once |
| 47 | +- Better compatibility with standard HTML table structure |
| 48 | +- Reduced complexity in handling scroll events |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +**Implications**: |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +- All rows in an active chunk are rendered, even if only some are visible |
| 53 | +- Works well for moderate-sized chunks but may be less optimal for very large chunks |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +## [2025-04-27 13:47:10] - Custom Hook for Scroll Tracking |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +**Decision**: Implemented scroll tracking logic in a separate custom hook (`useScrollBasedChunks`). |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +**Context**: The pagination system needs to track scroll position to determine which chunks should be rendered. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +**Rationale**: |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +- Separation of concerns: Isolates scroll tracking logic from rendering logic |
| 64 | +- Reusability: The hook can be used in different table implementations |
| 65 | +- Testability: Makes it easier to test the scroll tracking logic independently |
| 66 | +- Maintainability: Simplifies the main component by extracting complex logic |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Implications**: |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +- Requires careful management of dependencies and re-renders |
| 71 | +- Introduces a level of indirection that might make the code flow harder to follow |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +## [2025-04-27 13:47:10] - Independent Chunk Loading |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +**Decision**: Each chunk independently manages its own loading state and data fetching. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +**Context**: When scrolling through a large dataset, multiple chunks may need to be loaded at different times. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +**Rationale**: |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +- Parallel loading: Multiple chunks can load simultaneously |
| 82 | +- Fault isolation: Errors in one chunk don't affect others |
| 83 | +- Progressive rendering: Chunks can render as soon as their data is available |
| 84 | +- Better user experience: Visible parts of the table appear faster |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +**Implications**: |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- Requires careful management of API requests to avoid overwhelming the server |
| 89 | +- May result in duplicated requests if not properly integrated with a caching mechanism |
| 90 | +- Needs proper error handling at the chunk level |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## [2025-04-27 13:47:10] - RTK Query Integration |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +**Decision**: Use Redux Toolkit Query for data fetching in chunks. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +**Context**: The pagination system needs to fetch data for each chunk efficiently. |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +**Rationale**: |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +- Built-in caching: Avoids duplicate requests for the same data |
| 101 | +- Automatic refetching: Supports automatic refresh intervals |
| 102 | +- Loading and error states: Provides standardized ways to track loading and error states |
| 103 | +- Cancellation: Supports cancelling requests when components unmount |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +**Implications**: |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +- Creates a dependency on Redux and RTK Query |
| 108 | +- Requires proper configuration of query parameters for efficient caching |
| 109 | +- Adds complexity to the application's state management |
0 commit comments