|
1 | 1 | package balancers |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | import ( |
4 | | - "context" |
5 | 4 | "testing" |
6 | 5 |
|
7 | 6 | "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
8 | 7 |
|
| 8 | + "github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3/internal/mock" |
| 9 | + |
9 | 10 | "github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3/internal/balancer" |
10 | | - "github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3/internal/balancer/mock" |
11 | 11 | "github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3/internal/conn" |
12 | 12 | ) |
13 | 13 |
|
14 | 14 | func TestPreferLocalDC(t *testing.T) { |
15 | | - ctx := context.Background() |
16 | | - |
17 | 15 | conns := []conn.Conn{ |
18 | 16 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "1", LocalDCField: false}, |
19 | 17 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "2", State: conn.Online, LocalDCField: true}, |
20 | 18 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "3", State: conn.Online, LocalDCField: true}, |
21 | 19 | } |
22 | | - rr := PreferLocalDC(RoundRobin()).Create(conns) |
23 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
24 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
25 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
26 | | - |
27 | | - // ban local connections |
28 | | - conns[1].SetState(conn.Banned) |
29 | | - conns[2].SetState(conn.Banned) |
30 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx, balancer.WithAcceptBanned(true))) |
31 | | - require.Nil(t, rr.Next(ctx)) |
| 20 | + rr := PreferLocalDC(RoundRobin()) |
| 21 | + require.False(t, rr.AllowFalback) |
| 22 | + require.Equal(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, applyPreferFilter(rr, conns)) |
32 | 23 | } |
33 | 24 |
|
34 | 25 | func TestPreferLocalDCWithFallBack(t *testing.T) { |
35 | | - ctx := context.Background() |
36 | | - |
37 | 26 | conns := []conn.Conn{ |
38 | | - &mock.Conn{AddrField: "1", LocalDCField: false, State: conn.Online}, |
| 27 | + &mock.Conn{AddrField: "1", LocalDCField: false}, |
39 | 28 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "2", State: conn.Online, LocalDCField: true}, |
40 | 29 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "3", State: conn.Online, LocalDCField: true}, |
41 | 30 | } |
42 | | - rr := PreferLocalDCWithFallBack(RoundRobin()).Create(conns) |
43 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
44 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
45 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
46 | | - |
47 | | - // ban connections |
48 | | - conns[1].SetState(conn.Banned) |
49 | | - conns[2].SetState(conn.Banned) |
50 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx, balancer.WithAcceptBanned(true))) |
51 | | - require.Equal(t, conns[0], rr.Next(ctx)) |
| 31 | + rr := PreferLocalDCWithFallBack(RoundRobin()) |
| 32 | + require.True(t, rr.AllowFalback) |
| 33 | + require.Equal(t, []conn.Conn{conns[1], conns[2]}, applyPreferFilter(rr, conns)) |
52 | 34 | } |
53 | 35 |
|
54 | 36 | func TestPreferLocations(t *testing.T) { |
55 | | - ctx := context.Background() |
56 | | - |
57 | 37 | conns := []conn.Conn{ |
58 | 38 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "1", LocationField: "zero", State: conn.Online}, |
59 | 39 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "2", State: conn.Online, LocationField: "one"}, |
60 | 40 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "3", State: conn.Online, LocationField: "two"}, |
61 | 41 | } |
62 | 42 |
|
63 | | - rr := PreferLocations(RoundRobin(), "zero", "two").Create(conns) |
64 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
65 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
66 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
67 | | - |
68 | | - // ban zero, two |
69 | | - conns[0].SetState(conn.Banned) |
70 | | - conns[2].SetState(conn.Banned) |
71 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx, balancer.WithAcceptBanned(true))) |
72 | | - require.Nil(t, rr.Next(ctx)) |
| 43 | + rr := PreferLocations(RoundRobin(), "zero", "two") |
| 44 | + require.False(t, rr.AllowFalback) |
| 45 | + require.Equal(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, applyPreferFilter(rr, conns)) |
73 | 46 | } |
74 | 47 |
|
75 | 48 | func TestPreferLocationsWithFallback(t *testing.T) { |
76 | | - ctx := context.Background() |
77 | | - |
78 | 49 | conns := []conn.Conn{ |
79 | 50 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "1", LocationField: "zero", State: conn.Online}, |
80 | 51 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "2", State: conn.Online, LocationField: "one"}, |
81 | 52 | &mock.Conn{AddrField: "3", State: conn.Online, LocationField: "two"}, |
82 | 53 | } |
83 | 54 |
|
84 | | - rr := PreferLocationsWithFallback(RoundRobin(), "zero", "two").Create(conns) |
85 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
86 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
87 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx)) |
| 55 | + rr := PreferLocationsWithFallback(RoundRobin(), "zero", "two") |
| 56 | + require.True(t, rr.AllowFalback) |
| 57 | + require.Equal(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, applyPreferFilter(rr, conns)) |
| 58 | +} |
88 | 59 |
|
89 | | - // ban zero, two |
90 | | - conns[0].SetState(conn.Banned) |
91 | | - conns[2].SetState(conn.Banned) |
92 | | - require.Contains(t, []conn.Conn{conns[0], conns[2]}, rr.Next(ctx, balancer.WithAcceptBanned(true))) |
93 | | - require.Equal(t, conns[1], rr.Next(ctx)) |
| 60 | +func applyPreferFilter(b balancer.Balancer, conns []conn.Conn) []conn.Conn { |
| 61 | + if b.IsPreferConn == nil { |
| 62 | + b.IsPreferConn = func(c conn.Conn) bool { return true } |
| 63 | + } |
| 64 | + res := make([]conn.Conn, 0, len(conns)) |
| 65 | + for _, c := range conns { |
| 66 | + if b.IsPreferConn(c) { |
| 67 | + res = append(res, c) |
| 68 | + } |
| 69 | + } |
| 70 | + return res |
94 | 71 | } |
0 commit comments