Refactor type hints in cherry_pick_v2.py for consistency

This commit updates the `cherry_pick_v2.py` script to ensure consistent use of type hints by removing unnecessary comments that specify the `PullRequest` type. This change enhances code clarity and maintains flexibility in handling various object types.

Key changes:
- Removed comments indicating specific types for `pull_requests` and related functions.
- Streamlined function signatures to improve readability and maintainability.

Author: naspirato

.github/actions/validate_pr_description/validate_pr_description.py

@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ def generate_backport_table(pr_number: int, app_domain: str) -> str:
         url = f"{base_url}?{query_string}"
         url_ui = f"{base_url}?{query_string}&ui=true"
 
-        rows.append(f"| **{branch}** [![▶ {branch}](https://img.shields.io/badge/%E2%96%B6_{branch.replace('-', '_')}-4caf50?style=flat-square)]({url}) [![⚙️](https://img.shields.io/badge/%E2%9A%99%EF%B8%8F-ff9800?style=flat-square)]({url_ui}) |")
+        rows.append(f"| [![▶ {branch}](https://img.shields.io/badge/%E2%96%B6_{branch.replace('-', '_')}-4caf50?style=flat-square)]({url}) [![⚙️](https://img.shields.io/badge/%E2%9A%99%EF%B8%8F-ff9800?style=flat-square)]({url_ui}) |")
 
     # Generate URL for backporting multiple branches
     all_branches = ",".join(branches)

.github/scripts/cherry_pick_v2.py

@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
 Maintains order of input sources and creates PRs with proper metadata.
 """
 
-from __future__ import annotations
-
 import os
 import sys
 import datetime
@@ -42,13 +40,13 @@ class Source:
     title: str
     body_item: str
     author: Optional[str]
-    pull_requests: List[Any]  # github.PullRequest.PullRequest
+    pull_requests: List[Any]
 
 
 @dataclass
 class BackportResult:
     target_branch: str
-    pr: Optional[Any] = None  # github.PullRequest.PullRequest
+    pr: Optional[Any] = None
     conflict_files: List[ConflictInfo] = field(default_factory=list)
     cherry_pick_logs: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
 
@@ -110,7 +108,7 @@ def create_commit_source(commit, repo, logger) -> Source:
     )
 
 
-def create_pr_source(pull: Any, allow_unmerged: bool, logger) -> Source:  # pull: github.PullRequest.PullRequest
+def create_pr_source(pull: Any, allow_unmerged: bool, logger) -> Source:
     """Creates source from PR"""
     if not pull.merged:
         commit_shas = [c.sha for c in pull.get_commits()]
@@ -157,7 +155,7 @@ def detect_conflicts(repo_path: str, logger) -> List[ConflictInfo]:
     return conflict_files
 
 
-def get_linked_issues(repo, token: str, pull_requests: List[Any], logger) -> str:  # pull_requests: List[github.PullRequest.PullRequest]
+def get_linked_issues(repo, token: str, pull_requests: List[Any], logger) -> str:
     """Gets linked issues for all PRs"""
     all_issues = []
     owner, repo_name = repo.full_name.split('/')
@@ -387,7 +385,7 @@ def build_pr_content(
     return title, body
 
 
-def find_existing_backport_comment(pull: Any, logger):  # pull: github.PullRequest.PullRequest
+def find_existing_backport_comment(pull: Any, logger):
     """Finds existing backport comment"""
     try:
         for comment in pull.get_issue_comments():
@@ -398,7 +396,7 @@ def find_existing_backport_comment(pull: Any, logger):  # pull: github.PullReque
     return None
 
 
-def update_comments(backport_comments: List[Tuple[Any, object]], results: List, skipped_branches: List[Tuple[str, str]], target_branches: List[str], workflow_url: Optional[str], logger):  # backport_comments: List[Tuple[github.PullRequest.PullRequest, object]]
+def update_comments(backport_comments: List[Tuple[Any, object]], results: List, skipped_branches: List[Tuple[str, str]], target_branches: List[str], workflow_url: Optional[str], logger):
     """Updates comments with backport results"""
     if not backport_comments:
         return