Skip to content

percision in OPV2V dataset #42

@KuMyy

Description

@KuMyy

hi,
I trained CoAlign using the OPV2V dataset with the configuration file pointpillar_coalign.yaml, but the resulting accuracy is far from what you reported. My results are as follows:
AP@50
0.953
0.947
0.932
0.911

AP@70
0.869
0.841
0.809
0.776

I downloaded your provided model and configuration files for testing, and indeed, those results match what you stated in your paper. I compared my training setup with your provided config.yaml file, and they are identical—meaning the model architecture and hyperparameters are exactly the same.

Given that, why is there still a noticeable performance gap? Did you apply any additional processing or tricks during training? I'm using an RTX 3090, so hardware differences shouldn't be the issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions