Replies: 3 comments 9 replies
-
|
We could do it if we first added support to the extension for generating the documents. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Cool! This is it, right? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
I don't think it is a good idea:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Many libraries and frameworks do not use PHPStan/Psalm annotations or use them very rarely (except @phpstan-type, @psalm-type etc.). Instead, they write PHPStan/Psalm types in PHPDoc annotations.
For example:
etc.
Do we want to follow the same path?
Why it's worth doing this:
What are the arguments against:
Are there any other problems that are preventing us from doing this?
I would like to hear the opinions of others on this matter.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions